Let $f: V\rightarrow V$ be an endomorphism of complex vector spaces and $ f=f_S+f_N$ it's decomposition into semi-simple and nilpotent parts. Then apparently we have that the generalized eigenspace $V^{\lambda}(f):=\{v\in V|(f-\lambda\cdot id_V)^kv=0 \text{ for some } k\in \mathbb{N}\}$ is the same as the eigenspace $V_{\lambda}(f_S)$ of the semisimple part. I was able to proof $V_{\lambda}(f_S)\subset V^{\lambda}(f)$ but for the converse i am unsure. what I tried was the following: As $f_S$ and $f_N$ commute, we may write $$(f_N+f_S-\lambda\cdot id_V)^n=\sum_{k=0}^nf_N^k (f_S-\lambda \cdot id_V)^{n-k}$$ Now applying this to some $v$ in the generalized eigenspaces with the respective $n$, I have to conclude that $v$ is in the eigenspace of $f_S$. Can anyone help me?
2026-02-23 13:36:03.1771853763
generalized eigenspace is the same as the eigenspace of the semi-simple part.
67 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in EIGENVALUES-EIGENVECTORS
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Stability of stationary point $O(0,0)$ when eigenvalues are zero
- Show that this matrix is positive definite
- Is $A$ satisfying ${A^2} = - I$ similar to $\left[ {\begin{smallmatrix} 0&I \\ { - I}&0 \end{smallmatrix}} \right]$?
- Determining a $4\times4$ matrix knowing $3$ of its $4$ eigenvectors and eigenvalues
- Question on designing a state observer for discrete time system
- Evaluating a cubic at a matrix only knowing only the eigenvalues
- Eigenvalues of $A=vv^T$
- A minimal eigenvalue inequality for Positive Definite Matrix
- Construct real matrix for given complex eigenvalues and given complex eigenvectors where algebraic multiplicity < geometric multiplicity
Related Questions in GENERALIZED-EIGENVECTOR
- Generalized Eigenvectors when algebraic multiplicity greater than 1
- Find a constant to bound laplacian norm by gradient norm in finite dimension
- Second-order matrix equations
- Generalized eigenvectors from left and right Schur vectors
- Constructing matrices with the given eigenvalue and eigenspace
- How to use random projections to find matrices A,B s.t. AX=BY
- Why are Killing form, Cartan ${\frak h}$, and roots $\alpha$, related by $\kappa(h,[x,y])=\alpha(h)\kappa(x,y)$?
- Optimizing singular Rayleigh quotient subject to linear constraint
- Can one describe the algebraic multiplicity in terms of generalized eigenspaces and the minimal polynomial?
- Finding generalized eigenvectors from a Jordan form
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $v \in V^{\lambda}(f)$ and write it as $v = \sum_{\mu} u_{\mu}$ where $u_{\mu}\in V_{\mu}\left(f_S\right)$.
\begin{align} 0 = \left(f - \lambda \mathbf{id}\right)^{n} v &= \sum_{\mu} \left(f - \lambda \mathbf{id}\right)^n u_{\mu}\\ &= \sum_{\mu}\sum_{k=0}^{n} f_N^k\left(f_S- \lambda\mathbf{id}\right)^{n-k}u_{\mu}\\ &= \sum_{\mu} \sum_{k=0}^{n} \left(\mu - \lambda\right)^{n-k}f_N^ku_{\mu} \end{align}
Since $f_N^ku_{\mu}\in V_{\mu}\left(f_S\right)$ then for all $\mu$,
$$\sum_{k=0}^{n} \left(\mu -\lambda\right)^{n-k} f_N^k u_{\mu} = 0$$
For $\mu \neq \lambda$, let $p = \min \left\{k\ge 0\, :\, f_N^ku_{\mu} = 0\right\}$ (it exists since $f_N$ is nilpotent). If $p \ge 1$, then $f_N^{p-1}u_{\mu} \neq 0$, multiply the previous equation by $f_N^{p-1}$ and you will have:
$$\left(\mu - \lambda\right)^{n}f^{p-1}_{N} u_{\mu} = 0$$ so $f_N^{p-1}u_{\mu} = 0$. This proves that $p = 0$ and $u_{\mu} = f_N^pu_{\mu} = 0$. Finally, $v = u_{\lambda} \in V_{\lambda}(f_S)$.