Geometric Brownian motion, product ansatz rationale

420 Views Asked by At

My question is why does the subsequent product ansatz for the geometric Brownian motion work?

Suppose we have the gBm $$dS_t=\mu S_tdt+\sigma S_tdB_t,\ S(0)=S_0$$ We assume the solution is given by the product $V_t\cdot U_t$ where $V_t$ is the solution of the ODE $$dV_t=\mu V_tdt,\ V(0)=S_0$$ given by $$V_t=S_0e^{\mu t}$$ and $U_t$ is the solution of the SDE $$dUt=\sigma U_tdB_t,\ U(0)=1$$ given by (Ito's lemma) $$U_t=e^{-\tfrac{1}{2}\sigma^2t+bB_t}.$$ Inserting them in the product ansatz we indeed get the solution $$S_t=V_tU_t=S_0e^{(a-\tfrac{1}{2}\sigma^2)t+bB_t}$$ of the gBm.

My background in differential equations is limited, therefore I would appreciate some information regarding the rationale, which makes this work.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

2
On BEST ANSWER

It's a kind of "variation of constants"-approach.

To the given stochastic differential equation

$$dX_t =\mu X_t \, dt + \sigma X_t \, dB_t, \qquad X(0) = X_0 \tag{1}$$

we can associate a ordinary differential equation by removing the stochastic term:

$$dx_t = \mu x_t \, dt \qquad x(0)=c \tag{2}$$

We know that the (unique) solution to $(2)$ is given by

$$x_t = c e^{\mu t}, \qquad t \geq 0. \tag{3}$$

Now the idea is to use a variation-of-constants-approach to get a solution to the original SDE (1). To this end, we let the constant $c$ in (3) depend on $t$ and $\omega$, i.e. we make the ansatz

$$X_t(\omega) = C_t(\omega) e^{\mu t}. \tag{4}$$

If $(X_t)_{t \geq 0}$ is a solution, then it follows from

$$C_t = X_t e^{-\mu t}$$

and Itô's formula that

$$dC_t = \sigma C_t \, dB_t, \qquad C(0)=1.$$

The solution to this SDE can be calculated explicitly, and thus we can plug in $C_t$ into $(4)$. This gives us a candidate for the solution to the SDE (1) and by applying once more Itô's formula we can verify that the process is indeed a solution to the SDE.

The above approach can be easily adapted to more general SDEs of the form

$$dX_t = f(X_t) \, dt + g(X_t) \, dB_t, \qquad X(0)=x_0.$$

Unfortunately, I'm not aware of a general result which gives sufficient conditions which ensure that this variation-of-constants approach works.