let $S$ be a compact surface with non-empty boundary, let $\alpha : [0,1] \rightarrow S$ be a Properly-embedded arc (meaning both endpoints of the arc are in $\partial S$) and let $f$ be an element in $MCG(S)$, the mapping class group of $S$. Let $\alpha(0)=x$. I am trying to understand the geometric motivation behind the property of "right-veeringness" of $f$. We say that $f$ is right-veering if the orientation given at the point $x$ by the pair $(f'(\alpha(0)) ,\alpha'(0))$ agrees with the orientation of the surface $S$ at the point $x$. Any ideas ?
2026-03-28 02:24:29.1774664669
Geometric Intuition for "Right-Veering" Property of $f$ in MCG(S)?
126 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-TOPOLOGY
- Getting a self-homeomorphism of the cylinder from a self-homeomorphism of the circle
- what is Sierpiński topology?
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- The regularity of intersection of a minimal surface and a surface of positive mean curvature?
- What's the regularity of the level set of a ''semi-nondegenerate" smooth function on closed manifold?
- Help me to prove related path component and open ball
- Poincarè duals in complex projective space and homotopy
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- Prove that the sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$ which are both open and closed are $\emptyset$ and $\mathbb{R}^n$
Related Questions in GEOMETRIC-TOPOLOGY
- Finite covers of handlebodies?
- CW complexes are compactly generated
- Constructing a fat Cantor Set with certain property
- Homologically zero circles in smooth manifolds
- Labeled graphs with unimodular adjacency matrix
- Pseudoisotopy between nonisotopic maps
- A topological question about loops and fixed points
- "Continuity" of volume function on hyperbolic tetrahedra
- Example of path connected metric space whose hyperspace with Vietoris topology is not path connected?
- What is the pushout of $D^n \longleftarrow S^{n-1} \longrightarrow D^n$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For the overall definition: You need to either work in the universal cover and homotop lifts of $\alpha$ and $f(\alpha)$ so they don't intersect before checking the condition or work on the surface and homotop them so they intersect minimally. Then, $f$ is right veering if for all $\alpha$ the condition is true.
The condition: The condition is that the arc to $f(\alpha)$ starts out to the right of $\alpha$ at the boundary (i.e. at $0$). (That is, the initial tangent directions $(f \circ \alpha)'(0)$ and $\alpha'(0)$ form an oriented basis.) But this isn't robust under homotopy (or rather, isotopy of $f$ fixing the boundary), so the correct condition is to first homotop $f(\alpha)$ to intersect $\alpha$ minimally, and then see if it starts out heading rightward. (It would have to come across the arc an extra time if you change which direction it starts, so this is a well-defined concept.)
This first showed up in Honda-Kazez-Matic relating to tight contact structures. The basic idea is that $f$ not right-veering allows you to find an overtwisted disk in the contact manifold associated to the open book with monodromy $f$. Very roughly, this is because the way the contact structure associated to the open book works involves "continuing to twist further" in the right-veering way as you go closer to the binding. So non-right-veering means there'd have to be "extra twisting" and an overtwisted disk, meaning the contact structure is not tight.