At my calculus II class we are studying multivariable functions and yesterday er talked about the curl operator (we used the definition in "usage" section here.
The typical exercise we got as homework, was like: given a function $F:\mathbb{R}^3\to\mathbb{R}^3$, compute $\operatorname{curl}(F)$ and so far so good. Today I got this homework which is exactly the opposite, i.e. $$"\text{Let } \ G=\frac{x}{|x|^3}. \text{Find an example of } \ F:\mathbb{R}^3\to\mathbb{R}^3 \text{such that } \ G=\operatorname{curl}(F)."$$
The exercise was proposed for $G=\frac{x}{|x|^3}$ and $G=\frac{x}{|x|^2}$, so I guess there is a similar strategy.
Could someone please help me in find an example even in only one of the cases?
I am thinking to examples like $F(x)= x/|x|$, or to some powers, but it is not working.
Thank you.
The vector field $$ G(x,y,z)=\frac{1}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}}\begin{pmatrix}x\\y\\z\end{pmatrix}\,,\quad\text{ on }\mathbb R^3\setminus\{0\}, $$ describes Coulomb's law and Newton's law of universal gravitation and is mathematically interesting in many ways: It is rotation free and divergence free. A scalar function whose gradient is $G$ is $$ H(x,y,z)=-\frac{1}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{1/2}}\,. $$ The divergence freeness of $G$ suggests that there should be a vector field $F$ whose curl is $G\,.$ It turns out that
This was briefly remarked in this answer. After some confusion on my side an finally learning it from Ted Shifrin I'd like to sum it up a bit: If $F$ is defined on all of $\mathbb R^3\setminus\{0\}$ one can apply Stokes' theorem to each hemisphere separately to conclude that the flux of $G$ through the whole unit sphere must be zero but this cannot happen because the flux of $G$ is \begin{align} \oint_{S^2}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot G\,dS&=\oint_{S^2}\frac{\left(\begin{smallmatrix}x\\y\\z\end{smallmatrix}\right)}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{1/2}}\cdot \frac{\left(\begin{smallmatrix}x\\y\\z\end{smallmatrix}\right)}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}}\,dS\\ &=\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^\pi \sin\theta\,d\theta\,d\varphi=4\pi\,. \end{align} To see that on the contrary Stokes' theorem leads to a flux of zero (assuming that $F$ is defined on all of $\mathbb R^3\setminus\{0\}$) note that the line integral of $F$ along the boundary of each hemisphere equals the flux of $\nabla\times F=G$ through that hemisphere. But these line integrals cancel out because of their opposite orientation which leads to zero flux. A contradiction.
Another interesting picture shows the $[0,3\pi/2]$-sectors of the surfaces of constant speed $\|F\|\,.$ The blue surfaces has the slowest speed and the brown surface the highest. These surfaces converge at the origin.
Further properties of $F\,:$
The one-form $$ \omega=\frac{-y\,dx+x\,dy}{r^2+rz} $$ is closed if and only if $z=0\,.$ This follows from $(\nabla\times F)_3=\partial_xF_2-\partial_yF_1=G_3=z/r^3\,.$ For $z=0$ this form has interesting properties that I summarized here.
On the unit sphere $S^2$ the speed of the integral curves can be written more simply as $$ \|F\|=\sqrt{\frac{1-z}{1+z}}\,. $$ This is zero at the north pole $z=1$ and infinite at the south pole $z=-1\,.$ The vorticity of this vector field is, as we know, $\nabla\times F=G$ which on $S^2$ is simply $\left(\begin{smallmatrix}x\\y\\z\end{smallmatrix}\right).$ Due to the circular motion in planes parallel to the $xy$--axis this seems odd at points away from the poles. But this rotationally symmetric vorticity $G$ arises from different speeds of integral curves next to each other. In particular, near the equator we have practically a parallel flow with shear that has a nice animation here.