I have a problem that asks the following:
Let $V$ be a vector space, and $B_1 = \{x_1,x_2,x_3\}$ be a basis of $V.$ Let $y_1 = x_1 + x_3, y_2 = x_2 + x_3$, and $y_3 = x_3$
a) Prove that $B_2 = \{y_1, y_2, y_3\}$ is also a basis of $V.$
b) If $x \in V,$ and the coordinates of $x$ in basis $B_1$ are $[v]_{B_1} =\left[ \begin{array}{cc} 2\\ 5\\ -1\\ \end{array} \right]$, find coordinates of $v$ in basis $B_2$.
What I know:
A set of vectors forms a basis if the vectors are linearly independent.
So essentially I need to prove that $B_2$ meets this criteria right?
We have $$\alpha_1 y_1 + \alpha_2 y_2 +\alpha_3 y_3 = 0$$ which is the same as saying $$\alpha_1[y_1]_B + \alpha_2[y_2]_B + \alpha_3[y_3]_B = 0$$ which is $$\alpha_1[x_1+x_3]_B + \alpha_2[x_2+x_3]_B + \alpha_3[x_3]_B = 0.$$ Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this suggests that the vectors are linearly independent. Therefore, $B_2$ forms a basis of $V.$
As for the given coordinate, I'm not sure how I would use it to find the coordinates in basis $B_2$. What should I be doing here?
For the first half: Not quite, but it's pretty close. You still need to distribute the scalars and recombine everything: $$ \alpha_1[x_1+x_3]_B + \alpha_2[x_2+x_3]_B + \alpha_3[x_3]_B = 0 \\ [\alpha_1x_1+\alpha_1x_3]_B + [\alpha_2x_2+\alpha_2x_3]_B + [\alpha_3x_3]_B = 0 \\ [\alpha_1x_1+\alpha_1x_3 + \alpha_2x_2+\alpha_2x_3 + \alpha_3x_3]_B = 0 \\ [\alpha_1x_1 + \alpha_2x_2 + (\alpha_1 +\alpha_2 + \alpha_3)x_3]_B = 0 \\ \alpha_1[x_1]_B + \alpha_2[x_2]_B + (\alpha_1 +\alpha_2 + \alpha_3)[x_3]_B = 0 \\ $$
And now, because the $x_i$ form a basis of $V$, we may conclude that: $$ \alpha_1 = \alpha_2 = \alpha_1+\alpha_2+\alpha_3 = 0 \\ 0 + 0 + \alpha_3 = 0 \\ \alpha_3 = 0 $$
Which shows that yes, the $y_i$ are linearly independent and therefore a basis of $V$.
Remember what the question actually means. We're being asked to find a triplet of scalars, $\beta_i$, where: $$ 2x_1 + 5x_2 - 1x_3 = \beta_1(x_1 + x_3) + \beta_2(x_2 + x_3) + \beta_3x_3. $$ By inspection, $\beta_1$ must be 2, and $\beta_2$ must be 5, because those are the only terms which contain $x_1$ and $x_2$ respectively. For concreteness, you might imagine $[x_1, x_2, x_3] = [\hat{i}, \hat{j}, \hat{k}]$, so that it is "visually obvious" why this needs to be so (because the $\beta_1$ term is the only one with an $x$ component, and the $\beta_2$ term is the only one with a $y$ component, so if you want the components on the left to equal the corresponding components on the right, their respective coefficients must match).
Now that we have those picked out, the remaining algebra may serve as an exercise for the reader (Hint: Substitute $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ back into the equation, expand, and cancel like terms).