Let $S=\bigoplus_{n \geqslant 0}S_n$ be a finitely generated $\mathbb{Z}_{\geqslant 0}$-graded algebra over $\mathbb{C}$ with $S_+ \neq 0$, here $S_+:=\bigoplus_{n>0}S_n$. Let us also assume that $S$ is an integrally closed domain. We can consider $X:=\operatorname{Proj}S$. Is it true that the natural morphism $S_0 \rightarrow \Gamma(X,\mathcal{O}_X)$ is an isomorphism?
2026-03-25 20:36:31.1774470991
Global sections of $\operatorname{Proj} S$ when $S$ is an integrally closed domain
221 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in COMMUTATIVE-ALGEBRA
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Example of simple modules
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- $k[[x,y]]/I$ is a Gorenstein ring implies that $I$ is generated by 2 elements
- There is no ring map $\mathbb C[x] \to \mathbb C[x]$ swapping the prime ideals $(x-1)$ and $(x)$
- Inclusions in tensor products
- Principal Ideal Ring which is not Integral
Related Questions in PROJECTIVE-SCHEMES
- Do torsion-free $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules on curves have dimension one?
- Proper curves over some field are projective
- Global section $s$ of ample line bundle such that $X_s$ is everywhere dense
- Finite morphism $f:X \to \mathbb{P}_k^n$ is surjective?
- Conditions on $\mathcal{F}$ such that $\chi(\mathcal{F}) = 0$ for a coherent sheaf on a curve over $k$.
- Calculating Euler Characteristic of Closed Subscheme
- How to choose coordinates for a projective scheme.
- Properties of the Zariski topology on Proj
- The vanishing scheme of for a graded ring generated by elements of degree 1 (Vakil 4.5.P)
- Global sections of projective schemes
Related Questions in GEOMETRIC-INVARIANT-THEORY
- Moment maps unitary group acting on matrices
- Largest subgroup in which a given polynomial is invariant.
- Image of a subvariety under algebraic group actions
- Intuition for semistable points on a $G$-variety.
- Some basic conceptual questions regarding Algebraic Group.
- Reference on Geometric Invariant Theory
- Encoding the position information in real distance metric
- Use of GIT for moduli problems
- What is "locally integral" in Mumford's GIT book?
- GIT quotients under equivariant blowup
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes.
Injectivity follows from the fact that $S$ is a domain: if $s\in S_0$ is in the kernel of $S_0\to\Gamma(X,\mathcal{O}_X)$ then it's also in the kernel of $S_0\to\Gamma(X,\mathcal{O}_X)\to\Gamma(D(f),\mathcal{O}_X)$ for any nonzero homogeneous $f$ of positive degree. But this map is $S_0\to S_{(f)}$ by $s\mapsto \frac{s}{1}$, so if $\frac{s}{1}=\frac{0}{1}$ then $f^ns=0$, so $s=0$.
Surjectivity is slightly more interesting. Up to replacing $S$ by $S^{(d)}$, which preserves $\Gamma(X,\mathcal{O}_X)$, finite generation, and normality, we may assume $S$ is finitely generated as an $S_0$-algebra by $S_1$. Then $S$ is the coordinate ring of some closed subscheme $X\subset\Bbb P^n_{S_0}$, and $X$ is projectively normal by definition. On the other hand, for any projectively normal closed subscheme of $\Bbb P^n_A$ and any $d\geq 0$, the map $\Gamma(\Bbb P^n_A,\mathcal{O}_{\Bbb P^n_A}(d))\to\Gamma(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}(d))$ is surjective (cf Hartshorne chapter II section 5 exercise 14, for instance). Applying this to our situation, we have that $S_0=\Gamma(\Bbb P^n_{S_0},\mathcal{O}_{\Bbb P^n_{S_0}})$ surjects on to $\Gamma(X,\mathcal{O}_X)$.