Going from local to global definition in proving sets are manifolds

35 Views Asked by At

I'm new to manifolds and in exercise 4.2.1 from J.J. Duistermaat's Multidimensional Real Analysis I, I have to prove that $V = \{x\in\mathbb{R}^2 : x_2=x_1^3\}$ is a $C^{\infty}$ manifold.

The definition given in the book is Definition submanifold

First of all I do not know how to go from proving this for a single $x$ to going to the global case. For a single $x$, say $x=(1,1)$ I did the following:

Let $U=\{(x_1,x_2)\in\mathbb{R}^2\mid 0<x_1<2,0<x_2<8\}$ be an open neighbourhood of $x$. Let $W=\{x_1\in\mathbb{R}\mid 0<x_1<2\}$ be an open subset of $\mathbb{R}^1$. (so $d=1$ per the definition). Define $f(x_1)=x_1^3$. This is a $C^{\infty}$ mapping.

Then $V\cap U=\{(x_1,x_2)\in\mathbb{R}^2\mid 0<x_1<2, 0<x_2<8, x_2=x_1^3\}=\{(w, f(w))\in\mathbb{R}^2\mid w\in W\}$.

Therefore $V$ is a $C^{\infty}$ submanifold of $\mathbb{R}^2$ at $x$ of dimension $1$. (Quite a laborious proof)

How would we prove the global case? I see this proof can be mimicked for any chosen $x$, but how to prove it?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

The graph of a $C^k$-map $f : W \to \mathbb R^{n-d}$ defined on an open $W \subset \mathbb R^d$ is always a $C^k$-submanifold of $\mathbb R^n $ of dimension $d$. We have $$\text{Graph}(f) = \{(w,f(w)) : w \in \mathbb R^d \}.$$ For each $x \in \text{Graph}(f)$, the whole space $\mathbb R^n$ is an open neighborhood of $x$ in $\mathbb R^n$ such that $\text{Graph}(f) \cap \mathbb R^n = \text{Graph}(f)$ which proves our claim.

Now let $f : \mathbb R \to \mathbb R, f(w) = w^3$. This is a $C^\infty$-map such that $V = \text{Graph}(f)$.