I am trying to sketch a graphical version of proof of Riesz' representation Theorem:
Let H be a Hilbert space. For every $L \in H^*$ there exists a unique $u_L \in H$ such that:
\begin{align}
1. & \quad L x = (u_L, x) \text{ for every } x \in H, \\
2. & \quad \| L \| = \| u_L\|.
\end{align}
Does anybody have any suggestion, how to proceed?
2025-01-13 07:38:06.1736753886
Graphical version of the proof of Riesz’ Theorem
168 Views Asked by SmallElephant https://math.techqa.club/user/smallelephant/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- equivalent definitions of weak topology on a topological vector space
- Interpreting function notation?
- Dimension of $\ell^{1}$.
- Confusing on lower semi continuous and its application in minimize problem
- Uniform and Compact Open Topology on spaces of maps from $\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$
- Trace Class: Relativeness
- Extension theorem for Sobolev spaces $W^{1,\infty}(\Omega)$: is there an elementary proof?
- Counterexample to $L^1$-boundedness of the maximal operator $f \mapsto f^\#$ with $f^{\sharp}(x):=\sup_{Q\ni x}\frac{1}{|Q|}\int_{Q}|f-(f)_{Q}|dy$
- Video lectures on Functional Analysis
- Trignometry and Greatest Integer function analysis question .
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- How to solve the following parabolic pde?
- How to transform this nonhomogeneous equation into a homogeneous one by change of variables?
- $L^2$-norm of a solution of the heat equation
- Navier-Stokes on concentric cylinders
- Eliminate all parameters from the differential equation $u_t-Au_x-Bu^3+Cu_{xx}=0$.
- Prove there do not exists such distribution.
- Solving a heat equaton.
- Laplace equation :mean value formula for gradient of weak solution
- Solution of the IVP $\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{t}}+\frac{\partial^2{u}}{\partial{x^2}}=0$.
- When does a Riemaniann metric form a coercive quadratic form?
Related Questions in RIESZ-REPRESENTATION-THEOREM
- Riesz Representation Theorem proof in Bjork
- Let $E$ be a measurable set and let $g$ be a function defined on $E$. The product $fg$ belongs to $L^1(E)$ for every function $f \in L^1(E)$
- Continuous functions over a finite set using (probably) Riesz Representation Theorem
- Help with the proof of Riesz representation theorem
- Can you proof this problem without using Riesz Representation Theorem?
- Intuition behind Riesz-Markov Representation Theorem
- Using the Riesz Representation theorem to show a measure is unique.
- Proof of Riesz–Markov–Kakutani representation theorem in big Rudin
- Several questions about Riesz–Markov–Kakutani representation theorem
- Uniqueness of weak solutions and the Riesz Representation Theorem
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
The first geometric fact is that the null space of a non-zero linear functional $F$ on a real or complex linear space $X$ is a hyper plane, meaning that it is one dimension shy of being the entire space. Indeed, if $F(x)\ne 0$, you can normalize so that $F(x)=1$, and note that $F(y-F(y)x)=0$, which means every $y\in X$ can be uniquely written as $y = n +\alpha x$, where $n \in \mathcal{N}(F)$ and $\alpha$ is a scalar: $$ y = (y-F(y)x)+F(y)x. $$ Therefore, if $F$ is a non-zero linear functional, and if $G$ is another linear functional with $\mathcal{N}(F)\subseteq\mathcal{N}(G)$, then either $G=0$ or the null spaces must be equal, which forces $F$ and $G$ to be scalar multiples of each other. This follows from the above decomposition because $F(y-F(y)x)=0$ implies $G(y-F(y)x)=0$ for all $y$, which gives $G(y)=G(x)F(y)$ or $G=\alpha F$ where $\alpha=F(x)$ is a scalar constant.
Finally, in the case of a Hilbert space, if $F$ is a non-zero continuous linear functional, then $\mathcal{N}(F)\ne X$ is a closed subspace. So you can find a unit vector $y \perp \mathcal{N}(F)$, and note that $G(x)=(x,y)$ has the same null space as $F$. Therefore $F$ and $G$ must be constant multiples of each other.