We seek to find $g(x)$ with $x\in \mathbb{R}$ that satisfies $$(k^2 + \partial_x^2)g(x) = \delta(x)$$ Based on what I obtain in reference material, we try the following $$q(x) = e^{-ik|x|}$$ $$\partial_x q(x) = -ikq(x)\partial_x |x|$$ $$\partial_x^2 q(x) = -k^2q(x)(\partial_x |x|)^2 -ikq(x)\partial^2_x|x|$$ We might be tempted to now claim $(\partial_x |x|)^2 = 1 $ and $\partial^2_x|x| = 2\delta(x) $ and get $$\begin{align*}\partial_x^2 q(x) &= -k^2q(x) -2ikq(x)\delta(x) \\&\to -k^2q(x) -2ik\delta(x) \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;.\end{align*}$$ The last part might be done since $q(0) = 1$. But I am not sure these manipulations are on solid ground. Ideally I would like to be able to show this more rigorously in some way, perhaps using the test function method. $$\lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon}dx f(x)\left[k^2 +\partial^2_x\right]e^{-ik|x|} =-2ikf(0)$$
2025-01-13 00:06:57.1736726817
Green's function For Helmholtz Equation in 1 Dimension
5.6k Views Asked by WhatIAm https://math.techqa.club/user/whatiam/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ORDINARY-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- General solution to a system of differential equations
- ODE existence of specific solutions
- How to Integrate the Differential Equation for the Pendulum Problem
- Question about phase portrait and invariant subspaces
- Help in Solving a linear Partial differential equation
- Elimination of quantifiers in the strucure of polynomials and in the structure of exponentials
- Verifying general solution to differential equation
- Integrating $ \frac{\mathrm{d}^{2}v}{\mathrm{d}y^{2}} = \frac{\mathrm{d}p}{\mathrm{d}x} $
- Solving differential equation and obtain expressions for unknowns?
- For what value of $k$ is $2e^{4x}-5e^{10x}$ a solution to $y''-ky'+40y=0$?
Related Questions in DIRAC-DELTA
- Use the Inverse Fourier transform to show the Dirac-Delta function as a limit of the sinc function
- Identity of dirac delta function
- Dirac + Borel measure
- Integration by parts involving a special definition of a Dirac delta-distribution
- Identity for rescaled Dirac Delta, $\delta(kx)$
- Integrating function containing Dirac-delta
- What is the result of Heaviside function times the Dirac delta function?
- Integral with $\delta$ function
- Integral of Dirac Delta Function
- Fourier transforms and Dirac delta function
Related Questions in GREENS-FUNCTION
- Unique solution to a general second order BVP
- Radial Green's function
- Why does a compact Rieman surface not admit a Greens function?
- Boundary conditions for Green's function?
- Find the green function for the following BVP by using dirac delta function and solve the BVP using Green function
- fundamental solution of Fokker Plank equation for the Langevin equation of motion
- Solve PDE using eigenfunction expansion and solve Green's Function
- Green's Function for a Semi-Circle
- Sign of Laplacian Green's function in 3D
- Green's function for the Laplacian on $\Omega =[-1, \; 1]$ with Dirichlet boundary conditions in 1D
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
Taking the Fourier transform of both sides, $$ (k^2-(2\pi \omega)^2) \tilde{g}(\omega) = 1, $$ so $$ \tilde{g}(\omega) = \frac{1}{k^2-(2\pi \omega)^2} = \frac{1}{2k}\left(\frac{1}{2\pi \omega-k}-\frac{1}{2\pi \omega+k} \right) $$ At this point we have a problem: the fractions have poles on the real axis. And now you have to make a choice: the way in which you choose to evaluate the inverse transform will give you different options for the Green's function.
In particular, you can shift the poles off the real axis by adding a small imaginary part to the denominators: the signs of these determine what sort of Green's function you get. It's very similar to the retarded, advanced and Feynman propagators in QFT. Passing over the actual calculation (which is just the usual contour integration and Jordan's lemma argument), we obtain the following possible solutions: $$ G_r(x) = \begin{cases} -\frac{1}{k}\sin{kx} & x<0 \\ 0 & x \geqslant 0 \end{cases} \\ G_a(x) = \begin{cases} 0 & x < 0 \\ \frac{1}{k}\sin{kx} & x \geqslant 0 \end{cases} \\ G_f(x) = \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2ik}e^{-ikx} & x<0 \\ \frac{1}{2ik}e^{ikx} & x \geqslant 0 \end{cases} $$
You can check that all of these are continuous at $0$, and satisfy the jump condition found by integrating the equation over the delta: $$ [\partial_x g(x)]_{0-}^{0+} = 1. $$ They act in the same way as the retarded, advanced and Feynman propagators do in QFT: the first is causal/only stuff to the left of $x$ affects it, the second is anticausal (?), and the third is a weird mixture.