We seek to find $g(x)$ with $x\in \mathbb{R}$ that satisfies $$(k^2 + \partial_x^2)g(x) = \delta(x)$$ Based on what I obtain in reference material, we try the following $$q(x) = e^{-ik|x|}$$ $$\partial_x q(x) = -ikq(x)\partial_x |x|$$ $$\partial_x^2 q(x) = -k^2q(x)(\partial_x |x|)^2 -ikq(x)\partial^2_x|x|$$ We might be tempted to now claim $(\partial_x |x|)^2 = 1 $ and $\partial^2_x|x| = 2\delta(x) $ and get $$\begin{align*}\partial_x^2 q(x) &= -k^2q(x) -2ikq(x)\delta(x) \\&\to -k^2q(x) -2ik\delta(x) \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;.\end{align*}$$ The last part might be done since $q(0) = 1$. But I am not sure these manipulations are on solid ground. Ideally I would like to be able to show this more rigorously in some way, perhaps using the test function method. $$\lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon}dx f(x)\left[k^2 +\partial^2_x\right]e^{-ik|x|} =-2ikf(0)$$
2026-03-27 20:13:40.1774642420
Green's function For Helmholtz Equation in 1 Dimension
5.6k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ORDINARY-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Stability of system of ordinary nonlinear differential equations
- Maximal interval of existence of the IVP
- Power series solution of $y''+e^xy' - y=0$
- Change of variables in a differential equation
- Dimension of solution space of homogeneous differential equation, proof
- Solve the initial value problem $x^2y'+y(x-y)=0$
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
Related Questions in DIRAC-DELTA
- What is the result of $x(at) * δ(t-k)$
- Solution to ODE with Dirac Delta satisfies ODE
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Approximating derivative of Dirac delta function using mollifiers
- How to prove this Dirac delta limit representation is correct?
- $\int_{-\epsilon}^\epsilon\delta(f(x))g(x)dx=\frac{g(0)}{f'(0)}$?
- Properties about Dirac Delta derivative
- Dirac / Fourier relation
- Prove that $\frac{1}{\epsilon}\int_{\mathbb{R}}f(t).\exp\left(\frac{-\pi(x-t)^2}{\epsilon^2}\right)dt \xrightarrow{\epsilon \to 0}f(x) $
- Integral involving delta functions and vector quantities
Related Questions in GREENS-FUNCTION
- Why can Laplace’s Equation have a Green’s Function?
- How do I sum Green's functions to get an approximate solution?
- Who did develop the transfer function formalism?
- Green's function on Riemann surfaces of $\partial_{\bar z}$
- Could anyone help me to solve the following differential equation?
- Finding Greens Function using the delta function
- Find the Green's function $G(\mathbf{x},\xi)$, such that $\nabla^2G = \delta(\mathbf{x}-\xi)$
- Green function for high order Laplacian
- Using Green's function to solve 2d laplace equation
- Green kernel for Dirichlet problem of Stokes flow PDE's $\nabla p = \Delta\vec{v}, \nabla\cdot\vec{v}=0$ on a sphere
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Taking the Fourier transform of both sides, $$ (k^2-(2\pi \omega)^2) \tilde{g}(\omega) = 1, $$ so $$ \tilde{g}(\omega) = \frac{1}{k^2-(2\pi \omega)^2} = \frac{1}{2k}\left(\frac{1}{2\pi \omega-k}-\frac{1}{2\pi \omega+k} \right) $$ At this point we have a problem: the fractions have poles on the real axis. And now you have to make a choice: the way in which you choose to evaluate the inverse transform will give you different options for the Green's function.
In particular, you can shift the poles off the real axis by adding a small imaginary part to the denominators: the signs of these determine what sort of Green's function you get. It's very similar to the retarded, advanced and Feynman propagators in QFT. Passing over the actual calculation (which is just the usual contour integration and Jordan's lemma argument), we obtain the following possible solutions: $$ G_r(x) = \begin{cases} -\frac{1}{k}\sin{kx} & x<0 \\ 0 & x \geqslant 0 \end{cases} \\ G_a(x) = \begin{cases} 0 & x < 0 \\ \frac{1}{k}\sin{kx} & x \geqslant 0 \end{cases} \\ G_f(x) = \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2ik}e^{-ikx} & x<0 \\ \frac{1}{2ik}e^{ikx} & x \geqslant 0 \end{cases} $$
You can check that all of these are continuous at $0$, and satisfy the jump condition found by integrating the equation over the delta: $$ [\partial_x g(x)]_{0-}^{0+} = 1. $$ They act in the same way as the retarded, advanced and Feynman propagators do in QFT: the first is causal/only stuff to the left of $x$ affects it, the second is anticausal (?), and the third is a weird mixture.