Let $K^r$ be the r-skeleton of the simplicial complex $K$.Let $0\leq p <r$. I need to show that $H_p(K)$ is isomorphic to $H_p(K^r)$. All p-simplices of $K$ are simplices of$K^r$. So, $C_p(K)$ should be isomorphic to $C_p(K^r)$. How do I go forward with this? Any hints are much appreciated
2026-04-01 22:11:47.1775081507
$H_p(K)$ and $H_p(K^r)$ are isomorphic
58 Views Asked by user81883 https://math.techqa.club/user/user81883/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-TOPOLOGY
- How to compute homology group of $S^1 \times S^n$
- the degree of a map from $S^2$ to $S^2$
- Show $f$ and $g$ are both homeomorphism mapping of $T^2$ but $f$ is not homotopy equivalent with $g.$
- Chain homotopy on linear chains: confusion from Hatcher's book
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- CW-structure on $S^n$ and orientations
Related Questions in HOMOLOGY-COHOMOLOGY
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- $f$ - odd implies $d(f)$ - odd, question to the proof
- Poincarè duals in complex projective space and homotopy
- understanding proof of excision theorem
- proof of excision theorem: commutativity of a diagram
- exact sequence of reduced homology groups
- Doubts about computation of the homology of $\Bbb RP^2$ in Vick's *Homology Theory*
- the quotien space of $ S^1\times S^1$
- Rational points on conics over fields of dimension 1
Related Questions in GROUP-ISOMORPHISM
- Symmetries of the Tetrahedron - Geometric description and isomorphic correlations
- Showing that $2$ of the following groups are not isomorphic
- When can the isomorphism theorem for Groups be rewritten as a direct product?
- Smallest $n\in \mathbb{Z}_{>0}$ for existence of a monomorphism $G \rightarrow S_n$
- $\mathrm{Hom}(\mathrm{Hom}(G,H),H) \simeq G$?
- Do the results hold for isomorphisms of groups?
- Isomorphism about direct product of multiplicative group and direct product of additive group
- Direct Sums of Abelian Groups/$R$-Modules
- Injective Morphisms of Modules and Bases
- Suppose$f:S_{3}\longrightarrow R^{\ast}$is Homomorphism.Then Kernal of h has
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
OK, I will post it as an answer. If we are talking about simplicial homology, then the claim is rather obvious. Indeed, the simplicial complex $K^r$ has the same simplices as $K$ in degrees $p \le r$ and nothing else starting from degree $p = r+1$. So the chain complex for $K^r$ looks like $$0\to 0 \to C_r (K) \xrightarrow{d_r} C_{r-1} (K) \xrightarrow{d_{r-1}} C_{r-1} (K) \to \cdots \to C_1 (K) \xrightarrow{d_1} C_0 (K) \to 0$$ (I put zeros starting from $p=r+1$ since I discard the degenerate simplices; but it doesn't really matter.) Here the differentials are the same as in the complex $C_\bullet (K)$. Hence $$H_p (K^r) = H_p (K) = \ker d_p/\operatorname{im} d_{p+1} \quad \text{for }p \le r-1.$$ Note that starting from degree $r$, the homology will differ in general: you get $H_p (K^r) = \ker d_r$ and $H_p (K) = \ker d_r / \operatorname{im} d_{r+1}$, and $H_p (K^r) = 0$ for $p > r$.
In general, if you have $K' \subset K$, then you will obtain some subcomplex $C_\bullet (K') \subset C_\bullet (K)$. This means that you have subgroup inclusions $C_p (K') \subset C_p (K)$ such that the differentials in $C_\bullet (K')$ are the restrictions of differentials in $C_\bullet (K)$. Then you indeed may consider the long exact sequence associated to the pair $(K, K')$, but your particular case is much easier.
Degree-wise isomorphisms $C_p \cong B_p$, or in general maps $f_p\colon C_p\to B_p$, are not very meaningful. To conclude that these maps induce maps in homology, you need these maps to commute with the differentials of your complexes.
For example, two complexes $$0\to \mathbb{Z} \xrightarrow{0} \mathbb{Z} \to 0 \quad\text{and}\quad 0\to \mathbb{Z} \xrightarrow{\mathrm{id}} \mathbb{Z} \to 0$$ have different homology...