If $V$ is symplectic and $W^\perp \subseteq W\subseteq V$, then why is $W$ a pre-symplectic vector space? Why is $W/W^\perp$ symplectic?
2026-03-30 00:18:30.1774829910
Hamiltonian reduction in symplectic geometry
124 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in MANIFOLDS
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- On the differentiable manifold definition given by Serge Lang
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- Integration of one-form
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in SYMPLECTIC-GEOMETRY
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- Proof that 1-Form on a Symplectic Manifold is Closed?
- Time derivative of a pullback of a time-dependent 2-form
- Understanding time-dependent forms
- What is a symplectic form of the rotation group SO(n)
- Dimension of the Marsden-Weinstein reduction of a coadjoint orbit in the dual of the Lie algebra of the gauge group (Atiyah-Bott context)
- Symplectic form on the n-torus
- Computing the flow on the cotangent bundle
- Action-angle variables in non-compact level sets
- About the tangent space of a coadjoint orbit
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $V$ is symplectic, then it comes equipped with a symplectic form $\omega$. Then $\omega|_W$ is a skew-symmetric bilinear form on $W$, so that $(W, \omega|_W)$ is a pre-symplectic vector space.
To see that $W/W^\perp$ is symplectic, we need to check that $\omega|_W$ descends to a non-degenerate $2$-form on $W/W^\perp$. The natural pre-symplectic form on $W/W^\perp$ is $$\bar{\omega}: W/W^\perp \otimes W/W^\perp \longrightarrow \Bbb R,$$ $$\bar{\omega}([w], [v]) = \omega(w, v),$$ where $w$ (respectively $v$) is any choice of representative for $[w]$ (respectively $[v]$). It is trivial to check that $\bar{\omega}$ is well-defined since any two representatives of an element of $W/W^\perp$ differ by an element of $W^\perp$. To see that $\bar{\omega}$ is non-degenerate, suppose that for some fixed $[w] \in W/W^\perp$, $$\bar{\omega}([w],[v]) = 0 \text{ for all } [v] \in W/W^\perp.$$ This is equivalent to saying $$\omega(w, v) = 0 \text{ for any representative } w \text{ of } [w] \text{ and all } v \in W.$$ This implies that any representative $w$ of $[w]$ is an element of $W^\perp$, and hence $[w] = 0$. Therefore $\bar{\omega}$ is non-degenerate and $(W/W^\perp, \bar{\omega})$ is a symplectic vector space.