Consider a function which is harmonic in V (ie $\nabla^2 \Phi({\bf x}) = 0$ in V). If $\Phi({\bf x})$ is known on an arbitrary closed surface within V is the potential on the surface of V uniquely determined?
2026-04-01 01:58:55.1775008735
Harmonic functions question
115 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LAPLACIAN
- Polar Brownian motion not recovering polar Laplacian?
- Trivial demonstration. $\nabla J(r,t)=\frac{\hbar}{im}\nabla\psi^{*}\nabla\psi+\frac{\hbar}{im}\psi\nabla^2\psi$
- Bochner nonnegativity theorem for Laplace-Beltrami eigenfunctions?
- Physicists construct their potentials starting from the Laplace equation, why they do not use another differential operator, like theta Θ?
- Integral of the Laplacian of a function that is constant on the sphere
- Trying to show 9 point laplacian equivalence
- Does the laplacian operator work on time as well as spacial variables?
- Find the Green's function $G(\mathbf{x},\xi)$, such that $\nabla^2G = \delta(\mathbf{x}-\xi)$
- Laplace-Beltrami operator in $\mathbb{R}^m$
- demonstration of vector laplacian in cartesian coordinates
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I think the proof goes like this. Please check me on this.
First, let's define $V_1$ (with surface $S_1$) to be a subset of $V$ (with surface $S$). Since $\Phi$ is harmonic in $V$ then, by the well known uniqueness theorem for harmonic functions, the solution within $V_1$ is uniquely determined by its value on $S_1$.
Using the following theorem (see Foundations of Potential Theory by Kellog):
$\bf{Theorem}$: If U is harmonic in a domain T, and if U vanishes at all the points of a domain T' in T, then U vanishes at all points of T.
we can show that $\Phi$ is uniquely determined in all $V$ by its value on $S_1$. To do this assume that there are two harmonic functions $\Phi_1$ and $\Phi_2$ which are equal within $V$ (since both have the same boundary condition on $S_1$) and consider the harmonic function $U = \Phi_1 - \Phi_2$. Using the above theorem $U$ is zero at all points in $V$ and therefore $\Phi_1 = \Phi_2$ at all points in $V$. Therefore $\Phi$ is uniquely determined within $V$ by its value on $S_1$.
The final step is achieved by again invoking the usual uniqueness theorem to conclude that there is a uniquely determined value of $\Phi$ on $S$ given $\Phi$ within $V$.