I'm trying to find a subset $\ A\ $ of $\ \mathbb{N}\ $ that disproves Erdős Conjecture on Arithmetic progressions.
If we instead write $\ A\ $ as a (strictly) increasing sequence of integers, $\ (x_n)_n.\ $ My question is, has it been proven that, if $\ y_n = x_{n+1} - x_n\ $ is non-decreasing, then $\ x_n\ $ cannot be a counter-example to Erdős Conjecture? In particular, I was thinking about such sequences with the further property that there are infinitely many $\ n\in\mathbb{N}\ $ such that $\ x_n \geq 2 x_{n-1},\ $ because then at least we can be sure that these $\ x_n\ $ do not make arithmetic progressions of length three with any two $\ x_{k_1},\ x_{k_2} \ $ if $\ k_1,k_2 < n.$
I cannot think of how to disprove that such sequences (with or without the further property) can be both a "large set", and also have a maximum length arithmetic progression, but maybe there is a relatively simple proof, possibly using the pigeonhole principle, or maybe this hasn't been proven yet?
Now I realise my question is a bit silly and the answer is trivially "no". I'm not sure what I was trying to get at with the question, but I must have been thinking unclearly at the time and muddling ideas together. To simplify caduk's answer, I'll pick up from where he writes, "we need to have a constant $c$ that bounds the number of consecutive identical values".
Then it is clear that $\ \displaystyle\sum_n x_n\ $ is less than $\ c\ $ times the sum of the reciprocal triangle numbers.