Question

Prove anti-symmetric-ness of partial ordered set in lattice.

score 150 · Answer 1 · 2026-04-01 11:59:09

150

Views

Prove anti-symmetric-ness of partial ordered set in lattice.

Published on 01 Apr 2026 - 11:59

score 830 · Answer 2 · 2026-04-03 06:02:48

830

Views

union of cyclic groups

Published on 03 Apr 2026 - 6:02

score 262 · Answer 3 · 2026-03-28 21:26:44

262

Views

Contractibility of topological spaces associated to posets

Published on 28 Mar 2026 - 21:26

score 82 · Answer 4 · 2026-04-03 06:51:32

82

Views

A representation of well-orderings?

Published on 03 Apr 2026 - 6:51

score 511 · Answer 5 · 2013-11-15 18:08:16

511

Views

$\mathbb R\times\mathbb R$ not order isomorphic to $\mathbb R$

Published on 15 Nov 2013 - 18:08

score 453 · Answer 6 · 2013-11-17 10:27:09

453

Views

How to tell if relation on set is a partial order when relation is defined as a set of ordered pairs?

Published on 17 Nov 2013 - 10:27

score 4.7k · Answer 7 · 2013-11-18 22:58:50

4.7k

Views

Uniqueness of minimal elements in a totally ordered set

Published on 18 Nov 2013 - 22:58

score 134 · Answer 8 · 2026-04-04 15:20:40

134

Views

Is there anything wrong with this use of the axiom of choice?

Published on 04 Apr 2026 - 15:20

score 3.5k · Answer 9 · 2013-11-20 06:13:15

3.5k

Views

If a partial order has just one unique maximal element, must that element be a greatest element of x?

Published on 20 Nov 2013 - 6:13

score 169 · Answer 10 · 2013-11-24 11:42:18

169

Views

Is this a partially ordered set?

Published on 24 Nov 2013 - 11:42

score 48 · Answer 11 · 2013-11-29 04:27:20

48

Views

When can complete dense linear orders be made into topological fields?

Published on 29 Nov 2013 - 4:27

score 10.4k · Answer 12 · 2026-03-26 21:26:20

10.4k

Views

What is meaning of strict weak ordering in layman's term?

Published on 26 Mar 2026 - 21:26

score 353 · Answer 13 · 2026-03-26 17:51:36

353

Views

Reference Request on Order Theory topics

Published on 26 Mar 2026 - 17:51

score 149 · Answer 14 · 2026-04-06 12:39:57

149

Views

Can the obvious "product" of complete atomistic Boolean algebras be realized as a categorial product?

Published on 06 Apr 2026 - 12:39

score 65 · Answer 15 · 2013-12-03 04:34:08

Let $A$ denote a closed subset of $\mathbb{R}.$ Is it true that for all $B \subseteq A,$ if $B$ has a supremum, then $\mathrm{sup}(B) \in A$?

List Question

Prove anti-symmetric-ness of partial ordered set in lattice.

union of cyclic groups

Contractibility of topological spaces associated to posets

A representation of well-orderings?

$\mathbb R\times\mathbb R$ not order isomorphic to $\mathbb R$

How to tell if relation on set is a partial order when relation is defined as a set of ordered pairs?

Uniqueness of minimal elements in a totally ordered set

Is there anything wrong with this use of the axiom of choice?

If a partial order has just one unique maximal element, must that element be a greatest element of x?

Is this a partially ordered set?

When can complete dense linear orders be made into topological fields?

What is meaning of strict weak ordering in layman's term?

Reference Request on Order Theory topics

Can the obvious "product" of complete atomistic Boolean algebras be realized as a categorial product?

Let $A$ denote a closed subset of $\mathbb{R}.$ Is it true that for all $B \subseteq A,$ if $B$ has a supremum, then $\mathrm{sup}(B) \in A$?

Trending Questions

Popular # Hahtags

Popular Questions