I may have stumbled upon a property of Euler's constant, $e$.
Conjecture: $$ \lim_{a \to 0}\prod_{n=0}^\infty (1 + a(1-a)^{n}) = e $$
Take the geometric sequence 0.5, 0.25, 0.125 ... where Tn = 0.5 * 0.5^n. Now define a new series, whose terms are equal to (1+Tn). That is: 1.5, 1.25, 1.125 ... Multiply the first $x$ terms of this sequence together, to yield $y$. As $x$ approaches infinity, $y$ approaches approximately 2.384.
The geometric sequence which we started with has a sum which approaches 1. Infinite other geometric sequences also sum to approach 1. A geometric sequence can be defined by two variables: it's starting term, $a$, and the ratio, $r$, between each term and the previous one. The sum of a geometric sequence approaches $a$/(1-$r$). Thus, the set of sequences whose sum approaches one are defined by the relation $a$ = 1-$r$.
My conjecture is this: as $a$ approaches 0, the infinite product of (1+Tn) approaches e. Using a spreadsheet, I have calculated the product of the first 10,000 terms when $a$ = 0.001. This yeilds approximately 2.7176, slightly less than e.
I'd appreciate if anybody could either a) show that this method does not yield $e$; or b) prove that it is $e$
$\sum_{n=0}^\infty \ln(1 + a(1-a)^{n})\leq\sum_{n=0}^\infty a(1-a)^{n}=1$ is immediate.
Now for a lower bound. Note that $a(1-a)\rightarrow 0$ and that $a(1-a)^n>a(1-a)^{n+1}$.
Since $\ln(1+x)$ is concave, we have $\ln(1+x)\geq \dfrac{\ln(1+d)}{d}x$ whenever $x\in[0,d]$.
Therefore, an appropriate lower bound for the sum is $\dfrac{\ln(1+d)}{d}$, where $d=a(1-a)$. Now make $a$ arbitrarily small.