Have these bounds on Bessel function root spacing been proven?

377 Views Asked by At

Looking at the roots of the Bessel functions (particularly the Bessel functions of the first kind, $J_\nu(x)$), it seems that a lot is known. Poking around WolframAlpha plots, I have observed a couple of patterns in the spacing of adjacent roots, and I wanted to know if they've been proven in general or not. If $j_{\nu,n}$, $n \ge 1$, is the $n^{\mathrm{th}}$ positive zero of $J_\nu(x)$, then $\forall\ |\nu| \ge \frac{1}{2}$: \begin{align} j_{\nu,n+1}-j_{\nu,n} &\ge \pi \\ j_{\nu,n+1}-j_{\nu,n} &\ge j_{\nu,n+2}-j_{\nu,n+1}, \end{align} with the inequalities reversing for $|\nu| < \frac{1}{2}$, but not by much.

The reference linked in an answer to a previous question about Bessel function roots has on the bottom of page 492 (502 in pdf numbering) that for functions of the form $$\mathcal{C}_\nu(x) \equiv J_\nu(x) \cos\alpha - Y_\nu(x) \sin\alpha$$ with $\nu > \frac{1}{2}$ the roots that exceed $\frac{(2\nu+1)(2\nu+3)}{\pi}$ are bounded by the intervals $$\left(m\pi - \alpha + \frac{\nu\pi}{2} + \frac{\pi}{2},\ m\pi - \alpha + \frac{\nu\pi}{2} + \frac{3\pi}{4}\right)$$ for some integers $m$ (note that I cannot find any guarantee that the $m$ in this formula will correspond to the $n$ indexing the zeros, overall).

The limiting form of $J_\nu(x)$ certainly implies that the spacing has to trend to $\pi$ as $n\rightarrow \infty$, I know of no proof about whether that trend is from above or below.

Sorry, I'm rambling because it's late. Point being - are these properties provable?