I’m struggling to interpret the meaning of the following statement.
Let the multiplicative subgroup $H \subset \mathbb{F} $ have order $n+1$, and let $x\in H$. The polynomial $L_x$ of degree at most $n$ that vanishes on $H$ \ $\{x\}$ and has $f(x)=1$, with some constant $c_x$ has representation of the form $$L_x(X) = \frac{c_x(X^{n+1}-1)}{X-x}$$
Although I feel uncertain where exactly my confusion lies, I don’t believe I understand what is meant by “$L_x$ vanishes on $H$ \ $\{x\}$,” and by extension, I don’t follow that $L_x$ has that representation.
$L_x$ vanishes on $H \setminus \{x\}$ means that for all $y \in H \setminus \{x\}$, $L_x(y) = 0$.
As $\mathbb F$ is supposed to be a field, if we denote $\{x, y_1, \dots,y_n\}$ the elements of $H$, $(X-y_1) \dots(X-y_n)$ divides $L_x$ as $L_x$ vanishes on $H \setminus \{x\}$. Therefore the degree of $L_x$ is at least equal to $n$.
Now, $\frac{(X^{n+1}-1)}{X-x}$ also vanishes on $H \setminus\{x\}$ as the order of all elements of $H \setminus\{x\}$ divides the order of $H$, i.e. $n+1$.
Hence, it exists $c_x \in \mathbb F$ such that
$$L_x(X) = \frac{c_x(X^{n+1}-1)}{X-x}$$ as desired.