Theorem $17.$ Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional vector space over the field $F.$ For each vector $\alpha$ in $V$ define $$L_{\alpha}(f)=f(\alpha),\hspace{1cm}f\text{ in } V^{*}.$$
The mapping $\alpha \to L_{\alpha}$ is then an isomorphism of $V$ onto $V^{**}.$
Corollary. Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional vector space over the field $F.$ If $L$ is a linear functional on the dual space $V^{*}$ of $V,$ then there is a unique vector $\alpha$ in $V$ such that $$L(f)=f(\alpha)$$ for every $f$ in $V^{*}.$
The corollary being an obvious consequence is something that I am not able to see. This is probably because I started out this way :
Corollary says $\Bigg(\forall L\in V^{**}\Big(\exists \alpha \in V$ s.t$\big(\forall f \in V^{*} , L(f)=f(\alpha)\big)\Big)\Bigg).$
This means that $\Bigg(\exists L\in V^{**}$ s.t $\Big(\forall \alpha \in V\big(\exists f \in V^{*} $ s.t $ L(f)\ne f(\alpha)\big)\Big)\Bigg)$ should be a false statement.
Going this way, suppose there exists such an $L$ and $f$ such that $L(f)\ne f(\alpha)$ for all $\alpha.$ Integrating this with Theorem $17,$ we see that $L\ne L_{\alpha}$ for any $\alpha.$ But $\{L_{\alpha}\}_{\alpha \in V}$ exhausts $V^{**}$ $\square .$
Is this the contradiction that I should arrive at? Also I highly believe that what I have done is unnecessary complication of the problem, if so, please put forth a simple one.
If $V \ni \alpha \mapsto L_\alpha \in V^{\ast \ast}$ is an isomorphism, in particular it is surjective. So given $L \in V^{\ast\ast}$ there is an unique (because of injectiveness) $\alpha \in V$ such that $L = L_\alpha$. So, for all $f \in V^{\ast}$ you have $$L(f) = L_\alpha(f) = f(\alpha),$$as wanted.