Simple compact Lie groups have unique bi-invariant metrics. Hence, they are Riemannian manifolds in a unique way, so we can ask what is their holonomy group. Is there a relationship between the group $G$ and its holonomy group? For example, is the holonomy group $G$ itself?
2026-03-25 15:57:32.1774454252
Holonomy of Lie groups
648 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in LIE-GROUPS
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- homomorphism between unitary groups
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Is it true that if a Lie group act trivially on an open subset of a manifold the action of the group is trivial (on the whole manifold)?
- Find non-zero real numbers $a,b,c,d$ such that $a^2+c^2=b^2+d^2$ and $ab+cd=0$.
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in HOLONOMY
- Holonomy group and irreducible $\mathrm{SU}(2)$-connections
- In what way can the Riemannian curvature be regarded as a two-form with values in $\mathfrak{hol}$?
- Is the determinant of the holonomy gauge invariant / significant?
- Recovering a principal connection from its monodromy
- Holonomy and curvature on a surface
- Is the comparator $U(y,x)$ in Gauge Theory the same as a holonomy?
- Translation Holonomy
- Combinatorial analog of holonomy on a planar graph with quadrilateral faces
- Is there a class of non-symmetric spaces $G/SO(n)$ such that $Hol(G/SO(n))=SO(n)$?
- Correspondence between flat connections and fundamental group representations
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $(G,b)$ be a compact simple group equipped with the biinvariant metric. Let $Hol_e^0$ denote the identity component of the holonomy group of $G$ at $e\in G$.
Claim. $Hol_0$ is the identity component of the image of $G$ under the adjoint representation.
Proof. Let $H$ denote the isometry group of $(G,b)$. Then $H=L(G)R(G)$ meaning that every isometry of $(G,b)$ has the form $$ I_{g_1,g_2}: g\mapsto g_1 g g_2, g\in G $$ for some fixed $g_1, g_2$. (There might be a finite kernel of the map $I: G\times G\to H$.) A proof can be found for instance in Helgason's book "Differential Geometry and Symmetric spaces".
The stabilizer $H_e$ of $e$ in $H$ consists of isometries $I_{g,g^{-1}}$, which, therefore, acts on $T_eG$ via the adjoint representation of $G$. Next, $(G,b)$ is a symmetric space; it can be identified with $H/H_e$. Cartan proved that for each symmetric space without flat factors $X=H/K$, where $H$ is the full isometry group of $X$ and $K$ is the stabilizer of a point $p$ in $X$, $Hol_p^0=K^0$, the identity component of $K$. (
This should be again in Helgason's book.) Putting it all together, we obtain that in our setting $Hol_e^0=Ad(G)^0$. qedOne can extend this proof to the case of nonsimple compact groups. The minor difference is that holonomy equals the holonomy of the semisimple factor of $G$; at the same time, the abelian part of $G$ does not contribute to the adjoint representation.
I am not sure what happens when you consider not only identity components but the entire $G$ and $Hol_e$.
Edit. To my dismay, Helgason's book does not contain Cartan's theorem on holonomy. A proof can be found in
J.-H. Eschenburg, Lecture Notes on Symmetric Spaces, Theorem 7.2.