I have quite some problems understanding the definition/derivation of the gaussian integers.
We defined the notation $\mathbb{Z}[i]\subset \mathbb{C} $ the following way: $\mathbb{Z}[i]:=<\mathbb{Z} \cup i>$ and $<\mathbb{Z} \cup i>:=\bigcap_{R\subset \mathbb{C} , E \subset R}R$.
Now as far as I understand it here $\mathbb{Z}[i]$ is the smallest subring of $\mathbb{Z} \cup i$. But how do you get from this to $<\mathbb{Z} \cup i>= \{a+b*i | a,b\in \mathbb{Z}\}$? Why can't there be a subring like {...,-2,-1,0,1,2,...,i} or would this just not contain everything needed? Or is it just not a ring? And if so how do I get to the mentioned as the smallest subring?
Passing to the quotient rings it is enough to show that the smallest field containing $\mathbb{Q}$ and $i$ is given by $$ \mathbb{Q}(i)=\{a+bi\mid a,b\in \mathbb{Q}\}. $$ This is clear, because $i$ has minimal polynomial $x^2+1$ of degree $2$, so that $(1,i)$ is a basis of the field extension $\mathbb{Q}(i)$ over $\mathbb{Q}$. Hence the ring of integers in $\mathbb{Q}(i)$, given by $\{a+bi\mid a,b\in \mathbb{Z}\}$ is the smallest ring containing $\mathbb{Z}$ and $i$.