I looked into all the literature regarding systoles (ex. Katz) and everywhere I only see the statement, but without a proof. Also, if possible can anyone recommend me some articles or books on this topic? Thank you.
2026-03-26 06:11:02.1774505462
How can I prove that a systole of a close oriented hyperbolic surface S is a simple closed curve?
65 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in HYPERBOLIC-GEOMETRY
- Sharing endpoint at infinity
- CAT(0) references request
- Do the loops "Snakes" by M.C. Escher correspond to a regular tilling of the hyperbolic plane?
- How to find the Fuschian group associated with a region of the complex plane
- Hyperbolic circles in the hyperbolic model
- Area of an hyperbolic triangle made by two geodesic and an horocycle
- Concavity of distance to the boundary in Riemannian manifolds
- Differential Equation of Circles orthogonal to a fixed Circle
- Is there a volume formula for hyperbolic tetrahedron
- Can you generalize the Triangle group to other polygons?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
From your comment and the link provided there, I take your question to be the following:
Suppose that $\gamma : S^1 \to S$ is a closed geodesic.
I'll prove that if $\gamma$ is not simple then there is a shorter closed geodesic.
Since $\gamma$ is not simple, there exists a proper subarc $[x,y]$ of $S^1$ with $x \ne y$ such that $\gamma(x)=\gamma(y)$. The restriction $\gamma \mid [x,y]$ is therefore a closed curve. Clearly $$\text{Length}(\gamma \mid [x,y]) < \text{Length}(\gamma) $$ Also, $\gamma \mid [x,y]$ is not homotopically trivial, because if it were then $\gamma$ would be freely homotopic to the shorter curve $\gamma \mid S^1 - (x,y)$, contradicting that $\gamma$ is the shortest curve in its free homotopy class.
It follows that $\gamma \mid [x,y]$ is homotopic to a closed geodesic $\delta$. Also, $\delta$ is the shortest curve in its homotopy class, and therefore $$\text{Length}(\delta) \le \text{Length}(\gamma \mid [x,y]) $$ Putting this together, we have found a closed geodesic $\delta$ which is shorter than $\gamma$, using only that $\gamma$ is not simple.