We consider the analytic functions on an open set $U\subset\mathbb{C}$, which are also in $L^2(U)$. I've found several posts in this topic, but all of them references to classical complex analysis results. It's obvious, that the Bergman space ($L_a^2$) is a linear manifold, so it's efficient to prove the closeness of $L_a^2(U)$ in $L^2(U)$. According to Wikipedia:
This is a consequence of the estimate, valid on compact subsets K of D, that $$\sup\limits_{z\in K}\vert f(z)\vert \le C_K \Vert f \Vert_2,$$ which in turn follows from Cauchy's integral formula. Thus convergence of a sequence of holomorphic functions in $L^2(D)$ implies also compact convergence, and so the limit function is also holomorphic.
I can't proove neither the inequality, nor the compact convergence $\Rightarrow$ closeness of $L_a^2(U)$ implication. Please help!!!
The value at a point of a holomorphic function is the average value of the values in a ball around it. This shows that the supremum norm os bounded by the $ L^1$ norm and, a fortiori, by the $ L^2$ norm. (You need to fill gaps, using that you only need the bound on compact subsets)
For the second question, all you need to show is that the $ L^2$ limit of holomorphic functions is holomorphic again. This holds because Cauchy's formula is sufficient for holomorphy, and you can easily show that the Cauchy formula holds for the $ L^\infty$ limit. (Note from before that you have supremum bounds even for $ L^2$ convergent functions)