I understand that a two way proof is necessary to show that the two sets have the same members, but I don't know if I have achieved the correct proof. This is what I have written so far (I am very new to set theory):
Show that z\(x V y) = (z\x) ∧ (z\y)
z\(x ∨ y)
(x ∨ y) = a = {a : a ∈ x or a ∈ y}
z\(x ∨ y) = μ = {μ ∈ z : μ ∉ a} = {μ ∈ z: μ ∉ x and μ ∉ y}
{μ ∈ z: μ ∉ x and μ ∉ y} = (z\x) ∧ (z\y)
(z\x) ∧ (z\y)
(z\x) = b = {b ∈ z : b ∉ x}
(z\y) = c = {c ∈ z : c ∉ y}
(z\x) ∧ (z\y) = μ = {μ ∈ z: μ ∉ x and μ ∉ y}
μ = {μ ∈ z: μ ∉ x and μ ∉ y} = z\(x ∨ y)
z\(x ∨ y) = (z\x) ∧ (z\y)
Does this prove anything? I feel like I have just restated the different sides of the equations as sets and then reconnected them. Any comments would be appreciated.
Hint
Due to the fact that in set theory :
it is correct to say that for "a two way proof is necessary to show that the two sets have the same members".
You can do it step-by-step, "unwinding" the definitions.
Thus :
In turn, this gives us :
and thus, finally :