Dumb question... if tan(30°) is irrational (what I believe it is, it should be $\sqrt 3$), how can it be that, at the same time, is is describing the ratio of two sides within a triangle?
The triangle I have in mind looks like this (sorry for the cheap sketch):
So, $a$ is the angle (in this case 30 degrees), and AFAIK it should be possible to describe that angle by the ratio of the opposite and adjacent sides, $A$ and $B$, so: $a = \frac{A}{B}$... and there certainly exists a real-world triangle for $a=30°$, where the other two angles are $90°$ and $60°$... and the two lengths, $A$ and $B$, are just some real values, so their ratio should be a rational number... or not? :-)
It seems I'm missing something here...
That's correct, but you cannot assume that those values must be integers (or rationals).
Not so, a rational number is defined as the ratio of two integers, not of arbitrary reals. (Of course, every real can be written as the ratio of two reals e.g. $x = \dfrac{x}{1}$, so that doesn't define any additional or interesting property for such $x$.).
Incidentally, the fact that $\,\tan 30^\circ\,$ is irrational is (one) reason why an equilateral triangle cannot be drawn of graph paper (so that the coordinates of all vertices would be integers).