How can two different domains map to the same range in a function? I'm honestly trying to become better at math, so sorry if I come off as ignorant. A function must have every domain value associate to only one y-value. Ok, that makes sense. But then, in a function, one y-value IS able to map to 2 different domains. Why? This puzzles my logic. A function has a rule, so if, per say, my rule is f(x)=x+1 , then I can have the following set: {(1,2),(2,3)}. This set follows the function, however, I am unable to have a set such as: {(1,2),(1,3)}, ok so that makes sense according to my rule. However, a function CAN have a relation of the following: {(1,2),(2,2)}, this is allowed in a function, however, I don't see how this could ever follow my rule? Is there an example where my brain could be proved otherwise? lol Thanks guys!
How can two different domains map to the same range in a function?
2.6k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtThere are 2 best solutions below
On
Functions are designed to model specific relationships, where we associate with each input ("element of the domain") exactly one output ("element of the range"). There is a certain amount of asymmetry in this definition; nothing prohibits a function from sending several inputs to the same output (but fear not, we have such a concept in mathematics as well! Functions that do send different inputs to different outputs are called "one-to-one" or "injective").
It is not an accident that (given a function $f$, and an element $x$ in the domain of $f$) we generally say "$f$ of $x$" when we see $f(x)$. Lots of relationships in the real world are functions in the mathematical sense, and this is especially clear if we can say "the $\_\_\_$ of $\_\_\_$".
For example, "the (biological) mother of $x$" is a function from the set of all people to the set of all people, that associates with a person $x$ that person's mother. Any person has exactly one biological mother, and so it satisfies the definition of a function (each input person gets paired with exactly one output person).
If we denote this function by $f$, then for a given woman $y$, the equation $f(x) = y$ may have many different solutions; a woman may have more than one child, and for any child $x$ of mother $y$, "the mother of $x$ is $y$" is true (symbolically, $f(x) = y$). This is an example where different inputs (people) may get sent to the same output (their mother).
Here again we see asymmetry: If we had tried to define our function by "the child of $x$", that sends to each biological mother her child, this would not be a function: A given input (biological mother) may correspond to several outputs (that mother's children). It certainly constitutes a relationship between biological mothers and people, but in general, we haven't specified any criteria that makes the outputs unique.
I think intuitively the idea is A function takes its input and follows a rule to produce its output. Sometimes, following the rule for different inputs leads to the same output result.
You may be used to functions where different inputs always produce different outputs. For example, "adding one to a number" is a function where different inputs produce different outputs. Or "doubling a number".
However, some rules can behave differently: even if you start with two different inputs, the rule may transform them into the same output.
Here's an example: a function like $f(x)=x^2$ sends every number to its square. So, for example, $f(3)=3\cdot 3 = 9$. Because (-3)(-3) = +9, we know that $f(-3)=9$ as well. So, squaring -3 and squaring 3 end up as the same result.
So, the function is built of the tuples $(3,9)$ and also $(-3, 9)$.
Or you can consider the rule $g(x)$ which takes in a number and tells you whether it's odd or even. Then $g(2)=g(4)=g(6)=\ldots = \mathsf{even}$ and $g(1)=g(3)=g(5)=\ldots = \mathsf{odd}$. Many inputs lead to the same result.