In my optimization problem, I have a matrix $X = v v^H$ where $H$ denotes the complex conjugate transpose and $v \in \mathbb C^n$. This is a rank-$1$ matrix. In the published literature, it is mentioned that rank-$1$ matrix is also non-convex but I am unable to understand this. Can someone explain this to me why rank-$1$ matrix is also non-convex?
2026-02-23 03:29:47.1771817387
How can we show/prove that a rank-$1$ matrix is non-convex?
853 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in CONVEX-OPTIMIZATION
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- Least Absolute Deviation (LAD) Line Fitting / Regression
- Check if $\phi$ is convex
- Transform LMI problem into different SDP form
- Can a linear matrix inequality constraint transform to second-order cone constraint(s)?
- Optimality conditions - necessary vs sufficient
- Minimization of a convex quadratic form
- Prove that the objective function of K-means is non convex
- How to solve a linear program without any given data?
- Distance between a point $x \in \mathbb R^2$ and $x_1^2+x_2^2 \le 4$
Related Questions in MATRIX-RANK
- Bases for column spaces
- relation between rank of power of a singular matrix with the algebraic multiplicity of zero
- How to determine the rank of the following general $\mathbb{R}$-linear transformation.
- How to prove the dimension identity of subspace? i.e. $\dim(V_1) + \dim(V_2) = \dim(V_1 + V_2) + \dim(V_1 \cap V_2)$
- How can I prove that $[T]_B$ is a reversible matrix?
- can I have $\det(A+B)=0$ if $\det(A)=0$ and $\det(B) \neq 0$?
- Let $A$ be a diagonalizable real matrix such as $A^3=A$. Prove that $\mbox{rank}(A) = \mbox{tr}(A^2)$
- Row permuation of a matrix for a non-zero diagonal
- Tensor rank as a first order formula
- Rank of Matrix , Intersection of 3 planes
Related Questions in RANK-1-MATRICES
- Does $\det(I+A) = 1 + \mbox{tr}(A)$ hold if $A$ is a rank-$1$ complex matrix?
- Hessian with rank one
- Frobenius and operator norms of rank 1 matrices
- Rank one orthogonal projector matrix.
- Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the matrix $A = uu^t$, where $u\in\mathbb{R}^n$
- How can we show/prove that a rank-$1$ matrix is non-convex?
- Finding the best rank-one approximation of the matrix $\bf A$
- Minimal "dominating" rank-$1$ matrix
- Finding rank-$1$ matrix
- Number of rank 1 matrices with $0/1$ entries?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let me give this a go since I was wondering the same thing. Are you asking why the set of rank 1 matrices is not convex? Let's consider the following:
$x_1 = [0,1]^T$, $x_2 = [1,0]^T$. Therefore $x_1x_1^T = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$ and $x_2x_2^T = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$.
We note at this point that both $x_1x_1^T$ and $x_2x_2^T$ fall into the set of rank-1 matrices. However, their combination does not, and we can demonstrate this:
$\theta x_1x_1^T + (1-\theta)x_2x_2^T = \begin{bmatrix} 1-\theta & 0 \\ 0 & \theta \end{bmatrix}$, which is a rank-2 matrix. We cannot express this in the form $x_0 x_0^T$, (because what would $x_0$ be to allow me to get $x_0 x_0^T$ as seen above?) and it does not fall into the same set as the first two matrices $x_1x_1^T$ and $x_2x_2^T$.
Therefore the set of rank-1 matrices is not convex.