Really not sure how to go about the two questions here and I have not been able to find something similar like this online. Would appreciate anyones help on how to answer the two questions! Thank you in advance.
2026-04-06 18:58:47.1775501927
How do I add decimal expansions without a calculator
70 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ARITHMETIC
- Solve this arithmetic question without algebra
- Is division inherently the last operation when using fraction notation or is the order of operation always PEMDAS?
- Upper bound for recursion?
- Proving in different ways that $n^{n-1}-1$ is divisible by $(n-1)^2$.
- Meaning of a percentage of something
- Compare $2^{2016}$ and $10^{605}$ without a calculator
- The older you are, the richer you get?
- Easy question which doesn't make sense to me!
- Calculating diminishing interest amount
- Multiplication Question
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

When converting part a) to a fraction, you should get: $$\frac{67}{99}+\frac{94}{99}$$ If you divide by $99$, the digits on the numerator should repeat in the decimal form if the numerator is less than $100$ for positive integers.
Let me demonstrate why: $$\frac{67}{99}=\frac{67}{100}+\frac{67}{9900}=0.67+\frac{67}{9900}$$ We can continue this process: $$\frac{67}{9900}=\frac{67}{10000}+\frac{67}{990000}=0.0067+\frac{67}{990000}$$ $$\frac{67}{990000}=\frac{67}{1000000}+\frac{67}{99000000}=0.000067+\frac{67}{99000000}$$ Repeating this process infinitely gives: $$\frac{67}{99}=0.67+0.0067+0.000067\cdots=0.\dot{6}\dot{7}$$
So, try to convert the decimal forms you have into fractional form, and add the two fractions for part a) and multiply for part b).
If you wish, you can comment the answers you get below and I could verify them.