We know that structures defined by two atlases on the same topological space give the same smooth structure if their transition mappings are all smooth. For the two mentioned structures - the one defined by projections and the one defined by stereographical projections - I found all the transition mappings. Is it enough to say that these are differentiable because their coordinate mappings are all differentiable? Or would you find the Jacobian and somehow show it's not zero? Perhaps by induction? I tried the other way, since the first one didn't seem precise enough, but I haven't been able to find any general rule for that Jacobian
2026-03-27 12:31:43.1774614703
How do we prove that the two basic structures on an n-sphere (projection maps and stereography maps)give the same smooth structure?
110 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in SMOOTH-MANIFOLDS
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- An elementary proof that low rank maps cannot be open
- What does it mean by standard coordinates on $R^n$
- Partial Differential Equation using theory of manifolds
- Showing that a diffeomorphism preserves the boundary
Related Questions in SPHERES
- Name of some projection of sphere onto $\mathbb{R}^2$
- Deriving the Equation for Finding the Area of a Sphere
- Trilaterating 2D cartesian coordinates, without Z
- How many points define a sphere of unknown radius?
- Generate uniformly distributed points in n-dimensional sphere
- Arc length of curve of intersection between cylinder and sphere
- What are the tangent planes of the sphere B, which contains the line L?
- Find an equation of the curve that is the intersection of the sphere.
- Need help figuring out what I did wrong in solving for equation of sphere (and finding radius/center).
- Writing an Expression for the Volume of a Spherical Shell
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You have two atlases $\mathcal A, \mathcal A'$. You must show that all transition maps are differentiable. This means that for any two charts $\varphi : U \to V$ in $\mathcal A$, $\varphi' : U' \to V'$ in $\mathcal A$, the two transition maps $$\varphi^{-1}(U \cap U') \stackrel{\varphi}{\rightarrow} U \cap U' \stackrel{(\varphi')^{-1}}{\rightarrow} \varphi'(U \cap U')$$ $$(\varphi')^{-1}(U \cap U') \stackrel{\varphi'}{\rightarrow} U \cap U' \stackrel{\varphi^{-1}}{\rightarrow} \varphi(U \cap U')$$ are differentiable. This is equivalent to showing that one of them is a diffeomorphism.
Thus either you prove differentiability directly for both transition maps or you prove it for one and prove additionally that the Jacobian of this map has non-zero determinant in all points.
A simple example is this. On $\mathbb R$ we have two single chart atlases $\mathcal A = \{ id : \mathbb R \to \mathbb R \}$ and $\mathcal A' = \{ f : \mathbb R \to \mathbb R \}$ with $f(x) = x^3$. The transition maps are $f$ and $f^{-1}$. Note that $f^{-1}(x) = \sqrt[3]{x}$. $f$ is differentiable, but $f^{-1}$ is not (it has no derivative in $0$). The latter can either be shown directly or by invoking that $f'(0) = 0$.