I want to know how does a differential form looks in a matrix manifold. For example, given that the special linear group $$SL(n,R)$$ of all matrices with determinant 1 is a manifold, how looks a 1-form on it? All closed forms are exact?How can I prove it?
2026-03-29 12:25:31.1774787131
How does a differential form looks on a matrix manifold?
482 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in MANIFOLDS
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- On the differentiable manifold definition given by Serge Lang
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- Integration of one-form
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There are many possible ways to compute $H^1_{\text{dR}}(\text{SL}(n, \mathbf{R}))$ but arguably one that uses the least machinery goes as follows:
There is a diffeomorphism $\text{SL}(n, \mathbf{R}) \to \mathbf{R}^{(n+2)(n-1)/2} \times \text{SO}(n)$ given by the $QR$-decomposition, factoring a matrix in the domain into an upper triangular matrix with positive eigenvalues and determinant $+1$, and an orthonormal matrix with determinant $+1$. Note that this is effectively performing a Gram-Schmidt process on the columns of $\text{SL}(n, \mathbf{R})$. $\text{SO}(n)$ is therefore called the "maximal compact subgroup" of $\text{SL}(n, \mathbf{R})$. As this in particular implies $\text{SL}(n, \mathbf{R})$ deformation retracts to $\text{SO}(n)$, $H^1(\text{SL}(n, \mathbf{R})) \cong H^1(\text{SO}(n))$.
If $G$ is a compact connected Lie group, then for any $k$-form $\omega$ on $G$ one can perform an averaging operation to get a left-invariant $k$-form as follows: Let $L_g$ denote the diffeomorphism $G \to G$, $h \mapsto gh$ given by left multiplication by $g$. Then define $$\eta(X_1, \cdots, X_k) = \displaystyle \int_G L_g^*\omega(X_1, \cdots, X_k) \; d\mu(g)$$ where $\mu$ is the Haar measure on $G$, which is a unique bi-invariant measure. By construction $\eta$ satisfies $L_g^*\eta = \eta$, i.e., it is left-invariant. We shall show that $\eta$ is cohomologous to $\omega$. First of all, for any $g \in G$, let $\{g_t\}_{t \in I}$ be a path from the identity of the group to $G$. Then we have a homotopy $L_{g_t} : G \times I \to G$ between the identity and $L_g$. Since pullback of a form by homotopic maps are cohomologous, $L_g^*\omega$ is cohomologous to $\omega$. As all the translates of $\omega$ are cohomologous to $\omega$, the integral over them must be cohomologous to $\omega$ as well.
Therefore any $1$-form $\omega$ on $\text{SO}(n)$ is cohomologous to a left-invariant $1$-form $\eta$ on $\text{SO}(n)$. If $\omega$ is a closed form, then so is $\eta$, but then $0 = d\eta(X, Y) = X\eta(Y) - Y\eta(X) - \eta([X, Y])$. If $X$ and $Y$ are both left-invariant, then $\eta(X)$ and $\eta(Y)$ are both constant, hence has zero directional derivative. Hence $\eta([X, Y]) = 0$ for all pairs of left-invariant vector fields $X, Y$. Let $\mathfrak{f} : \mathfrak{so}(n) \to \mathbf{R}$ be the linear functional corresponding to $\eta$ at the identity; the previous condition implies $\mathfrak{f}([v, w]) = 0$ for all $v, w\in \mathfrak{so}(n)$ - i.e., $\mathfrak{f}$ vanishes on the commutator ideal $[\mathfrak{so}(n),\mathfrak{so}(n)]$, giving rise to a functional on $\mathfrak{so}(n)/[\mathfrak{so}(n), \mathfrak{so}(n)]$. Conversely every such functional can be extended to a left-invariant $1$-form on $\text{SO}(n)$ by translating. Note as well that if $\omega$ is exact, so is $\eta$, in which case it's the zero form.
So (no pun intended) $H^1(\text{SO}(n))$ is isomorphic to the space of closed left-invariant $1$-forms on $\text{SO}(n)$ which is in turn $(\mathfrak{so}(n)^{ab})^*$. $\mathfrak{so}(n)$ is a perfect Lie algebra for all $n \geq 3$, therefore $H^1(\text{SO}(n)) = Z^1(\text{SO}(n)) = 0$ for all $n \geq 3$. For $n = 2$, we know by hand that $H^1(\text{SO}(2)) = \mathbf{R}$ as $\text{SO}(2) \cong S^1$.