How exactly is the Fourier transform the same as the Gelfand transform?

326 Views Asked by At

This answer states the Fourier transform is the Gelfand transform on the Banach algebra $L^1(G)$ with convolution. I've read the resource linked in the answer, but I still have some confusion.

My first questions is simply how can this be true? Wouldn't the Gelfand transform of $f\in L^1(G)$ (let's denote it $\Gamma(f)$) simply operate as $\Gamma(f)(\chi) = \chi(f)$? This doesn't seem to be how the Fourier transform acts, which instead maps $\chi\mapsto(f*\chi)(1)$. I don't see clearly how these mappings relate to one another.

Perhaps this is explained by the bijection $\widehat{G}\to\Delta(L^1(G))$ mapping $\chi\mapsto(f\mapsto\hat{f}(\chi))$ (which I believe I do understand) but I don't see how to make this work either.

My second question is somewhat contingent on the answer to the first, but I'll try my best. Letting $A(\widehat{G}) = \{\hat{f}:f\in L^1(G)\}$, if I accept that the Fourier transform is somehow the Gelfand transform, I would immediately know that $A(\widehat{G})$ is dense in $C(\widehat{G})$. Since I don't yet believe that Fourier=Gelfand, can I easily deduce this from Gelfand-Naimark?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

For your first question: Try to determine which are the bounded $\ast$-homomorphisms $\chi:L^1(G) \to \mathbb C$ for $G$ Abelian. Observe that if $G$ is discrete taking $g \mapsto \chi(\delta_g)$ give you a character (and this is a bijection). If $G$ is not discrete you would have to use "approximations of identity" or look up Chapter 3/Section 3.2 of

Folland, Gerald B., A course in abstract harmonic analysis, Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. viii, 276 p. (1995). ZBL0857.43001.

For your second question: Use Stone-Weierstrass theorem. You'll have to show that $A(G)$ separates points, which can be done using that if $f, g \in L^2(G)$ have supports $E$, $F$, then $f\ast g$ has support contained in $E F$.