I am doing fine in my classes and enjoy math. That is not the issue.
During my spare time, I am doing more advanced stuff than my class is currently doing. My question is though, would I benefit more from a tutor / teacher in learning stuff outside the current classes I am taking or is learning on my own the superior?
Especially since I am content with my current school marks and more interested in stuff outside the curriculum, I do not see a reason to pay substantial amounts of money for a tutor as it is more pleasure than work to me. But, would a tutor be of much benefit in this case? Would I have a hard time finding a teacher / tutor that would help me learn more advanced stuff without breaking the bank?
I should note I am still in high school. As such, most tutors in my area cater towards just showing people the stuff they need to pass final exams. I wish to know more than just cookie cutter explanations, where should I be looking for tutors if I choose to get one?
I guess one reason I ask is in Robert Greene's book "Mastery", he puts a heavy emphasis on the apprenticeship phase and how many "Masters" had someone teaching and devoting significant time to them along the way.
Most people find some stuff pretty hard to study in their own, and having a tutor with knowledge and experience can't be bad. That's one of the main didactic reasons universities exist, otherwise most people would simply "learn on their own".
Anyway, as you advance in your studies, you'll find it easier to study and learn new stuff on your own.