I'm not able to understand how $BPP = BPP_{1/2+n^{-c}}= BPP_{1-2^{n^{-d}}} $ Can any body explain this to me in simple terms. Any help on this is highly appreciated.
2025-01-13 02:24:30.1736735070
How is $ BPP = BPP_{1/2+n^{-c}}= BPP_{1-2^{n^{-d}}} $
317 Views Asked by pseudo_teetotaler https://math.techqa.club/user/pseudo-teetotaler/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGORITHMS
- What is the big O when I subtract two sets?
- How to check if any subset of a given set of numbers can sum up to a given number
- Which perfect squares can be written as the sum of two squares?
- LCM Challenge Range Query
- Fast polynomial division algorithm over finite field
- How to prove log n! = Ω(nlog n)?
- Can monotone cubic interpolation be implemented explicitly in B-spline form?
- Why is time complexity of `fun` $O(n)$?
- Is there an algorithm for deciding big/little-O queries?
- What is the proper notation for these functions?
Related Questions in COMPUTATIONAL-COMPLEXITY
- Worst Case Analysis
- P is properly contained in DTIME(T'(n)).
- Is this proof of the worst-case performance of linear search correct?
- Big O with multiple variables ($n,m$): Is $O((n+1)^m) = O(n^m)$?
- Complexity of computing $ABx$ depends on the order of multiplication
- Giving an asymptotically tight bound on sum $\sum_{k=1}^n (\log_2 k)^2$
- Calculate bigO notation of recursive relation
- Derive a ϴ(1) formula for a Recurrence relation
- How many times will the statement 5 be executed?
- Turing machine that accept L = {ww} in linearithmic time
Related Questions in TURING-MACHINES
- Reducability and decidability language
- Why is there, for every language L in NP, a Turing machine with polynomial memory that also accepts L?
- Turing machine that accept L = {ww} in linearithmic time
- Are languages that contain the empty string Turing-Decidable?
- Need help in understanding proof "approach" and meaning for "1st order Theory of dense linear orders w/o endpoints is PSPACE complete"
- Design Turing Machine
- Language decidability and Post's theorem
- Abstract machines that compute primitive recursive functions
- Draw a Turing machine that recognizes $\{w \in\{0,1\}^*\,|\,w\text{ contains even number of 1's}\}$
- Prove that the class of Turing Decidable Languages is strictly larger than class of Context Free Languages
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
The key idea is that because the probability of error is less than one half you can decrease that probability further by repeatedly running the algorithm a polynomial number of times and accepting the majority result. For example, using the standard definition of $BPP$ which has a 1/3 probability of error, if you wanted a 99% probability of getting a correct answer, you would need to run the algorithm enough times that the probability of getting a majority wrong answer is less than 1%. For n runs the probability of a majority of runs producing the wrong answer is $1 / 3^{(n/2)+1}$. Solving for $n$:
$$ \begin{align*} \frac{1}{3^{(n/2)+1}} &< \frac{1}{100} \\ 3^{(n/2)+1} &> 100 \\ \frac{n}{2}+1 &> log_3 100 \\ \frac{n}{2} &> (log_3 100) - 1 \\ n &> 2(log_3 100 - 1) \\ n &> 2(4.19 - 1) \\ n &> 6.38 \\ \end{align*} $$
So 7 runs should produce a majority correct answer with 99% certainty. As the overall formula indicates, you can always do this sort of amplification with a number of runs that has a logarithmic relationship to the degree of certainty required.