Please, help me make equivalent transformations with this formula (A∨C→B)(A→C)(¬B→¬A∧C)(¬A→(C→B))(B→¬C→¬A). Thanks.
2026-04-03 18:08:31.1775239711
How make equivalent transformations?
235 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROPOSITIONAL-CALCULUS
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Can we use the principle of Explosion to justify the definition of implication being True when the antecedent is False?
- Simplify $(P \wedge Q \wedge R)\vee(\neg P\wedge Q\wedge\neg R)\vee(\neg P\wedge\neg Q\wedge R)\vee(\neg P \wedge\neg Q\wedge\neg R)$
- Alternative theories regarding the differences between the material conditional and the indicative conditionals used in natural language?
- Translations into logical notation
- Is the negation of $(a\wedge\neg b) \to c = a \wedge\neg b \wedge\neg c$?
- I am kind of lost in what do I do from here in Propositional Logic Identities. Please help
- Boolean Functional completeness of 5 operator set in propositional logic
- Variables, Quantifiers, and Logic
- Comparison Propositional Logic
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You cannot "mix" in this way different "conventions" regarding symbols.
If you want to use propositional connectives (like : $\lor, \land$) instead of boolean operators (like : $\cdot, +$) you have to rewrite your formula with $\lor$ in place of $+$ and $\land$ in place of $\cdot$ (justaxposition).
If so, I think that your formula must be :
having restored some missing parentheses.
Then we eliminate $\rightarrow$, through the equivalence between $P \rightarrow Q$ and $\lnot P \lor Q$.
In this way, splitting the problem, we have five conjuncts to consider:
(i) $((A∨C)→B)$ is : $\lnot (A∨C) \lor B$ which, by De Morgan, is : $(\lnot A \land \lnot C) \lor B$, which in turn is equivalent to : $(\lnot A \lor B) \land (B \lor \lnot C)$, by distributivity.
In boolean form is : $(\bar {A} + B)(B + \bar {C})$.
(ii) $(A→C)$ is simply : $(\lnot A \lor C)$. In boolean : $(\bar {A} + C)$.
(iii) $(¬B→(¬A \land C))$ is : $B \lor (\lnot A \land C)$, using double negation, which in turn is equivalent to : $(\lnot A \lor B) \land (B \lor C)$, by distributivity.
In boolean form is : $(\bar {A} + B)(B + C)$.
(iv) $(¬A→(C→B))$ is : $A \lor (\lnot C \lor B)$. In boolean : $(A + B + \bar {C})$.
(v) $(B→(¬C→¬A))$ is : $\lnot B \lor (C \lor \lnot A)$. In boolean : $(\bar {A} + \bar {B} + C)$.
Now, we can "reassemble" the conjuncts (i) to (v) without redundant terms :
Now we start with boolean simplification, "inserting" the missing terms [i.e. : $(\bar {A} + B)$ is rewritten as : $(\bar {A} + B + C\bar {C})$ i.e. $(\bar {A} + B + C)(\bar {A} + B + \bar {C})$ ] :
and cancel the redundant terms :
This is the standard Product-of-Sums (POS) Form.