In the question: Integral $\int_1^\infty\frac{\operatorname{arccot}\left(1+\frac{2\pi}{\operatorname{arcoth}x-\operatorname{arccsc}x}\right)}{\sqrt{x^2-1}}\mathrm dx$, the value of that integral was conjectured to be $\frac{\pi\,\ln\pi}4-\frac{3\,\pi\,\ln2}8$.
Apart from the fact that this integral is interesting, I want to avoid this question to be a copy of that one, and my attention went to the statement:
the value is correct up to at least 900 decimal digits
My (imho) intuitive question is this: How many decimal digits are necessary to be considered a valid formal proof?
I know this is not the usual way to prove an integral, but since we have computers that can check many digits I think it is time to ask ourselves such questions !
I am aware of "mathematical coincidence," however I assume there must be limits to this coincidence.
I also understand that the amount of digits needed to be considered a proof depends on the "length" of the integrand and the conjectured value of the integral. By "length" I mean some measure of data size. For example the amount of functions, additions, multiplications, constants, etc. used.
Consider your question under the assumption that the value of the integral winds up being
$$\frac{\pi\,\ln\pi}4 \; -\; \frac{3\,\pi\,\ln2}8 \; + \; 10^{-901}$$
or
$$\frac{\pi\,\ln\pi}4 \; -\; \frac{3\,\pi\,\ln2}8 \; + \; 10^{-10000}$$
or
$$\frac{\pi\,\ln\pi}4 \; -\; \frac{3\,\pi\,\ln2}8 \; + \; 10^{-10^{100}}$$