I was trying to find a mathematical way to find out how exactly how many terms it takes, but I've no idea. I just know that it's a lot. Thank you!
2026-04-06 00:50:34.1775436634
How many terms does it take in the expansion of arctan(x) to get pi to 10 decimal places?
2.9k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in TAYLOR-EXPANSION
- Mc Laurin and his derivative.
- Maclaurin polynomial estimating $\sin 15°$
- why can we expand an expandable function for infinite?
- Solving a limit of $\frac{\ln(x)}{x-1}$ with taylor expansion
- How to I find the Taylor series of $\ln {\frac{|1-x|}{1+x^2}}$?
- Proving the binomial series for all real (complex) n using Taylor series
- Taylor series of multivariable functions problem
- Taylor series of $\frac{\cosh(t)-1}{\sinh(t)}$
- The dimension of formal series modulo $\sin(x)$
- Finding Sum of First Terms
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If you are using the Taylor expansion centered around $0$ of $\arctan x$, $$ x - \frac{x^3}{3} + \frac{x^5}{5} + \dots$$ then you'll see it is an alternating series if $x > 0$. To get $\pi$, you might compute $\arctan 1 = \frac{\pi}{4}$. So we want to compute the series $$ 1 - \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5} + \ldots$$
In general, it is easy to understand the error from alternating series. The error is less than the first omitted term. And heuristically, you might expect the error to be about half of the first omitted term - although this is a weak heuristic.
So here, if you want the error to be correct up to 10 decimal places, then you want to find the first term less than $10^{-11}$. Unfortunately, this is about the $5\cdot 10^{10}$th term in the series, which makes this an impractical way to calculate $\pi$.
Bonus edit:
If you're a bit more clever, you might know that $\arctan \frac{1}{2} + \arctan \frac{1}{3} = \frac{\pi}{4}$ as well. These are also both alternating series, but now the errors are much better controlled. In particular, every four terms of the series will give another digit (or so) of accuracy. So using the first forty terms of these two series and adding them together will also give an approximation of $\pi$ accurate to at least ten decimal places.
You could go deeper. It also turns out that $$ 4\arctan\frac{1}{5} - \arctan\frac{1}{239} = \frac{\pi}{4},$$ which is nice in that three additional terms of the series gives 2 (or so) digits of accuracy. So computing the first 15 terms of these expansions and adding them together would also do. Formula of this sort are called "Machin-like formulae," named after John Machin, who first came across them.