Q1: Assuming suitable consistency assumptions is the following consistent?
$ZFC+V=L+\text{Existence of class many weakly compact cardinals}$
Q2: What is the weakest known consistency assumption for proving the above consistency result?
Q1: Assuming suitable consistency assumptions is the following consistent?
$ZFC+V=L+\text{Existence of class many weakly compact cardinals}$
Q2: What is the weakest known consistency assumption for proving the above consistency result?
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
This is equiconsistent with $ZF+$ "There are class many weakly compacts." If $\kappa$ is weakly compact in $V$, then it is weakly compact in $L$. (See Jech chapter 17.) Thus the $L$ of any model of $ZF$ + "There are class many weakly compacts" is a model of $ZFC+V=L +$ "There are class many weakly compacts."