Having just finished my first (and wonderful) year of undergraduate math studies, there is a certain "skill" I find myself still struggling with, as if I've made no progress regarding it since my first lecture in my first course.
As the title subjects, I'm referring to being able to keep track of the different notations, scripts, symbols assigned "on the fly" to note specific objects, either during lecture, or when I find mydelf reading a mathematical text. It's important to emphasize that I'm not referring to the difficulty of understanding formal / rigorous proofs, but simply to that of keeping track of all the different objects currently under discussion.
I'll provide two examples to illustrate what I mean more concretely:
- This is a direct construction of a completion for some metric space. I find myself easily getting lost between all of the possible combinations of ($[x] \ \hat{x} \ x \ x_n \ \langle x \rangle $), even though these notations are used to refer to completely different things. This confusion persists even after I know the proof good enough to write it down and explain it myself.
- This simple exercise, that involves showing that if a locally compact subset $A$ of some topological $T_2$ space $X$, is dense ($A$ is dense in $X$), than $A$ is open. Even though after finishing my topology course, the exercise itself seems easy, I find it overwhelmingly hard to read the short answers in the link provided. The hardest part: remembering what $V, U, O, D, A, X$ all stand for, and transitioning every single moment form treating (for example) U as a subset of spaces, $D$, or $A$, or $X$.
Now the main frustration is that I can easily find myself investing a great deal of time when reading material. Alternatively, during lecture I can find myself totally lost.
Question:
What can one do improve his ability to quickly "digest" patterns, notation, values, etc. (In other words - to avoid the difficulty I've just described)? I would especially appreciate those who've had the same struggles and found a way to deal with it.
A couple of remarks:
- I know that a lot (maybe most) of people seem to be completely unaffected by this kind of difficulty, but I'm also pretty certain that a lot of students are familiar with this problem. Thus - I find it relevant to post as question on this site.
- I've found the following question relevant, but not the same: This one explicitly states similar challenges (among other things) regarding notation, but answers seem to focus on how mathematicians write in order to make their ideas easier to read.
I think this is something almost everyone learning some sort of abstract math goes through.
I think what you should focus more on, is looking at what those symbols define, and what mathematical object those symbols are a placeholder for.
The only advice I can give is to simply push through this stage, it gets better trust me. There'll come a time down the road when you'll be looking at symbols and seeing the underlying concepts instead of just some Greek letter.
I know this seems like some very vague and even weird answer, so to concretely make sense of what I'm saying. Suppose we had the following passage from your favorite topology book:
What any topologist would do in this situation is either draw a diagram or form a mental image, similar to the one below, to keep track of whats being said
Once you have a clean grasp of what those symbols define, instead of $X$ I could put a symbol of a baby panda, it wouldn't make a difference though because I'd still be talking about the same topological space.
Specifically for Topology, it's incredibly helpful to draw pictures to avoid getting lost behind symbols.