I am reading a paper where the author is working with the following metric $$g = \frac{-dt^2 + dx^2}{t^2}$$ on the manifold $M=[0,\infty)\times \mathbb{R}^3.$ He then goes on to state that $$\Box_g u = (t\partial_t)^2 u - 3 t\partial_t u -t^2 \Delta u.$$ I am not very well versed in geometry, so I am not sure how to derive the above expression. I know that the usual wave operator is $u_{tt}-\Delta u$ but I am guessing that because we are working with the metric $g$ we have some modifications. Any comments on how to derive the above expression will be much appreciated.
2026-04-02 05:30:32.1775107832
How to compute the wave operator with respect to a metric?
149 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in WAVE-EQUATION
- Can I obtain an analytical solution for the wave equation with a non-zero neumann BC?
- Solve $U_{tt}=a U_{xx}$ when a<0.
- General solution of the wave equation
- Finding the general solution of an equation.
- The energy method for $u_{tt}-du_t-u_{xx}=0, (0,1)\times(0,T) $
- Bounds on solutions of the wave equation
- Wave equation with Robin and Neumann boundary conditions
- Prove that $|\Phi(p)|^2 \propto\sin^2\left( \frac{p L}{\hbar}\right) $
- Wave Equation Intuition in the case of a horizontal string
- Multi-variable chain rule - confusion in application
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Take a look at Definition of Tensor Laplacian; more specifically, the end of the answer where I write the coordinate formula for the Laplacian of a smooth function: \begin{align} \Delta_gu&=\frac{1}{\sqrt{|g|}}\frac{\partial}{\partial x^a}\left(\sqrt{|g|}g^{ab}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x^b}\right)\tag{$*$} \end{align} In that post, I merely stated that the above coordinate formula follows from the abstract definition $\Delta_gu= \text{div}(\text{grad}_gu)$. Recall that the gradient is the vector field associated to $du$ via the metric (below $g^{\sharp}:T^*M\to TM$ is the inverse musical isomorphism): \begin{align} \text{grad}_g(u):=g^{\sharp}(du)=g^{\sharp}\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x^a}\,dx^a\right)=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x^a}g^{\sharp}(dx^a)= \frac{\partial u}{\partial x^a}g^{ab}\frac{\partial}{\partial x^b} \end{align} i.e the gradient has components $(\text{grad}_g(u))^b=g^{ab}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x^a}$. Once you have the formula for the components of the gradient, you need to calculate the divergence. For this, you need to know the Voss-Weyl formula, which I prove here. So, this establishes the formula $(*)$.
Now, for your specific case, I assume of course that you mean $dx^2+dy^2+dz^2$ in your definition of the metric. In this case, the components written out as a matrix are: \begin{align} [g_{ab}]= \begin{pmatrix} -\frac{1}{t^2}&0&0&0\\ 0&\frac{1}{t^2}& 0&0\\ 0&0&\frac{1}{t^2}&0\\ 0&0&0&\frac{1}{t^2} \end{pmatrix}\quad\text{and} \quad [g^{ab}]= \begin{pmatrix} -t^2&0&0&0\\ 0&t^2&0&0\\ 0&0&t^2&0\\ 0&0&0&t^2 \end{pmatrix} \end{align} and $\sqrt{|g|}:=\sqrt{|\det [g_{ab}]|}=\frac{1}{t^4}$ (the upstairs indices mean take the inverse matrix). So, carrying out the Einstein summation in $(*)$, we get \begin{align} \Delta_gu&=t^4\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(\frac{1}{t^4}\cdot (-t^2)\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}\right)+ \sum_{i=1}^3t^4\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}\left(\frac{1}{t^4}\cdot t^2\frac{\partial u}{\partial x^i}\right)\\ &=-t^4\left[\frac{1}{t^2}\frac{\partial ^2u}{\partial t^2}+\left(-\frac{2}{t^3}\right)\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}\right]+t^2\sum_{i=1}^3\frac{\partial^2u}{(\partial x^i)^2}\\ &=-t^2\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial t^2}+2t\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}+t^2\sum_{i=1}^3\frac{\partial^2u}{(\partial x^i)^2} \end{align} So, I guess the $3\partial_tu$ in your post should actually be $2\partial_tu$.
What I found is the overall minus of what you wrote, so perhaps the author is defining $\Box_g$ as $-\Delta_g$ (which is weird, because I've always used the box operator to mean the Laplacian given by the metric), or perhaps the overall signature of the metric should have an extra minus sign. Anyway, I leave this minus sign issue to you to figure out based on the conventions.