These two theorems are equivalent but I can not figure out how to deduce the open mapping from the closed graph. Can anyone give a hint or some reference?
2026-04-13 05:53:37.1776059617
How to deduce open mapping theorem from closed graph theorem?
5.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in BANACH-SPACES
- Problem 1.70 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Is the cartesian product of two Hilbert spaces a Hilbert space?
- Why is $\lambda\mapsto(\lambda\textbf{1}-T)^{-1}$ analytic on $\rho(T)$?
- Is ${C}[0,1],\Bbb{R}$ homeomorphic to any $\Bbb{R^n}$, for an integer $n$?
- Identify $\operatorname{co}(\{e_n:n\in\mathbb N\})$ and $\overline{\operatorname{co}}(\{e_n : n\in\mathbb N\})$ in $c_0$ and $\ell^p$
- Theorem 1.7.9 of Megginson: Completeness is a three-space property.
- A weakly open subset of the unit ball of the Read's space $R$ (an infinite-dimensional Banach space) is unbounded.
- Separability of differentiable functions
- Showing $u_{\lambda}(x):= \left(\frac{\lambda}{{\lambda}^{2}+|x|^2}\right)^{\frac{n-2}{2}}$ is not sequentially compact in $L^{2^{*}}$
- Proving that a composition of bounded operator and trace class operator is trace class
Related Questions in ALTERNATIVE-PROOF
- Are $[0,1]$ and $(0,1)$ homotopy equivalent?
- An isomorphism $f:G_1 \to G_2$ maps the identity of $G_1$ to the identity of $G_2$
- Simpler Derivation of $\sin \frac{\pi}{4} = \cos \frac{\pi}{4} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$,
- inequality with arc length integral
- In how many ways can the basketball be passed between four people so that the ball comes back to $A$ after seven passes? (Use recursion)
- Deriving the gradient of the Augmented Lagrangian dual
- An irreducible Markov chain cannot have an absorbing state
- Clarifying a proof that a certain set is an algebra
- Dilogarithmic fashion: the case $(p,q)=(3,4)$ of $\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\text{Li}_p(x)\,\text{Li}_q(x)}{x^2}\,dx$
- Proof by contrapositive: $x^4 + 2x^2 - 2x \lt 0 \Rightarrow 0 \lt x \lt 1$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The proof linked to by David is the standard one, but the write-up strikes me as somewhat clumsy.
Here's my take on this argument:
Suppose $T: X \to Y$ is continuous and onto.
The map $\pi: X \to \bar{X} = X/ \operatorname{Ker}{T}$ is open, onto and continuous. The map $T$ factors over $\pi$ via a continuous linear bijection $\bar{T}: \bar{X} \to Y$ by definition of the quotient topology.
By continuity of $\bar{T}$ the graph of $\bar{T}$ is closed. Switching coordinates $(\bar{x},y) \mapsto (y,\bar{x})$ is a homeomorphism $\bar{X} \times Y \to Y \times \bar{X}$ and it maps the graph of $\bar{T}$ to the graph of $\bar{T}^{-1}$, so the graph of the linear map $\bar{T}^{-1}$ is closed, too. By the closed graph theorem $\bar{T}^{-1}$ is continuous.
For all open $U \subset X$ the set $T(U) \subset Y$ is open because it is the pre-image of the open set $\pi(U)$ under the continuous map $\bar{T}^{-1}$, hence $T$ is open.
Note: Step 2. is a proof of the inverse mapping theorem from the closed graph theorem.