Given the general equation of a conic $Ax^2 + Bxy + Cy^2 + Dx + Ey + F = 0 $, is there a way to determine if an arbitrary point $(x_1,y_1)$ lies inside or outside of the conic (ex. parabola or ellipse)?
2026-03-30 05:16:22.1774847782
How to determine if arbitrary point lies inside or outside a conic
1.8k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ANALYTIC-GEOMETRY
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
- Surface by revolution
- All possible values of coordinate k such that triangle ABC is a right triangle?
- Triangle inside triangle
- Is there an equation to describe regular polytopes?
- How do I prove that the gradient between a fixed and any general point on a given line is $m$?
- Three-Dimensional coordinate system
Related Questions in CONIC-SECTIONS
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
- Do projective transforms preserve circle centres?
- A Problem Based on Ellipse
- Perfect Pascal Mysticum Points
- I need to rotate this parabola around the y axis, but can't find the correct expression
- Prove that the common chord passes through the origin.
- Rotated ellipse tangent to circle
- tangent to two different branches of the hyperbola
- Probability that a triangle inscribed in an ellipse contains one of its foci
- Locus of mid point of intercepts of tangents to a ellipse
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $g(x,y) = Ax^2+Bxy+Cy^2+Dx+Ey+F$. I think the condition you want is that $(x_1,y_1)$ is "inside" the conic if and only if $$ g(x_1,y_1) \quad\text{has the same sign as}\quad \left|\begin{matrix} 2A & B & D \\ B & 2C & E \\ D & E & 2F \end{matrix}\right| $$ (If that determinant is zero, the conic is degenerate — see this question — so the idea of "inside" doesn't make sense.) This works for ellipses and hyperbolas at least, and I think it works for parabolas too, though I don't see how to prove it now.
The idea is that the conic $g(x,y)=0$ divides the plane into two regions $g(x,y)<0$ and $g(x,y)>0$, one of them being "inside" and the other "outside"; to find out which is which, test the centre $(x_c,y_c)$ of the conic (which is inside if it's an ellipse and outside if it's a hyperbola). It turns out that $$ \left|\begin{matrix} 2A & B & D \\ B & 2C & E \\ D & E & 2F \end{matrix}\right| = 2g(x_c,y_c) \left|\begin{matrix} 2A & B \\ B & 2C \end{matrix}\right| \tag{$\ast$} $$ The determinant on the RHS is the (negative of the) discriminant of the conic; if the conic is an ellipse, that determinant is positive, so $g(x_c,y_c)$ and the determinant on the LHS have the same sign (which is what we want, because the centre is inside), whereas if the conic is a hyperbola then the determinant on the RHS is negative, so $g(x_c,y_c)$ and the determinant on the LHS have opposite signs (which is what we want, because the centre is outside).
To show ($\ast$), use the fact that $\nabla g(x_c,y_c)=0$; since $$ \frac{\partial g}{\partial x}(x,y) = 2Ax+By+D \qquad\text{and}\qquad \frac{\partial g}{\partial y}(x,y) = Bx+2Cy+E \text{ ,} $$ we get that $$ \left[\begin{matrix} 2A & B & D \\ B & 2C & E \end{matrix}\right] \left[\begin{matrix} x_c \\ y_c \\ 1 \end{matrix}\right] = \left[\begin{matrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{matrix}\right] $$ and so $$ g(x_c,y_c) = \frac12 \left[\begin{matrix} x_c & y_c & 1 \end{matrix}\right] \left[\begin{matrix} 2A & B & D \\ B & 2C & E \\ D & E & 2F \end{matrix}\right] \left[\begin{matrix} x_c \\ y_c \\ 1 \end{matrix}\right] = \frac12 (Dx_c+Ey_c+2F) $$ whence $$ \left|\begin{matrix} 2A & B & D \\ B & 2C & E \\ D & E & 2F \end{matrix}\right| = \det\left( \left[\begin{matrix} 2A & B & D \\ B & 2C & E \\ D & E & 2F \end{matrix}\right] \left[\begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & x_c \\ 0 & 1 & y_c \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{matrix}\right]\right) = \left|\begin{matrix} 2A & B & 0 \\ B & 2C & 0 \\ D & E & 2g(x_c,y_c) \end{matrix}\right| $$ which gives ($\ast$).