How to eliminate prime factors from algebraic integers?

68 Views Asked by At

I'm trying to eliminate prime factors from algebraic integers. Is the following true without further restrictions? And how can I prove it?

Let $p,N,M\in\mathbb Z$, let $p$ be prime such that $gcd(p;N)=1$.

Let $x\in\mathbb C$ such that $p\cdot M\cdot x$ and $N\cdot x$ are algebraic integers.

Then $M\cdot x$ is also an algebraic integer.

3

There are 3 best solutions below

3
On BEST ANSWER

Because $\gcd(p,N)=1$ there exist integers $u,v\in\Bbb{Z}$ such that $$up+vN=1.$$ By assumption $pMx$ and $Nx$ are algebraic integers, hence so is $$u\cdot pMx+vM\cdot Nx=(up+vN)Mx=Mx.$$

0
On

This is true. Let $ap + bN = 1$, where $a,b \in \mathbb{Z}$. $NMx$ is also an algebraic integer, so $a(pM)x + b(NM)x = Mx$ is an algebraic integer.

0
On

More conceptually: the set $I = \{n\in \Bbb Z\ :\ n x \in \Bbb I\}$ is easily verified to be a (denominator) ideal.

Since $I$ contains $pM,N$ it contains their gcd $\,(pM,N) = (M,N),\,$ so also its multiple $M$.

Remark $ $ Likely you are familiar with more elementary manifestations such as the well-known fact that if a fraction can be written with denominators $\,c,d\,$ then it can be written with denominator $\,\gcd(c,d),\,$ or analogous results about orders of elements, e.g. here.. Conceptually it is better to avoid direct Bezout-based proofs and instead think of these results in terms of denominator or order ideals..

I used an exact order analog here, where I mention the fractional form below (with your notation)

Lemma $ $ If a fraction is writable with denominator $\,N\,$ and also with denominator $\,pM\,$ where $(N,p)=1$ then the fraction can be written with denominator $\,M$.

The order form used there is as follows.

Lemma $\,\ $ If $\ (N,p)=1\,$ then $\, a^{\large N}\equiv 1\equiv a^{\large pM}\, $ $\Rightarrow\, a^{\large M}\equiv 1$