Let $(M,g)$ be a Riemannian manifold and $TM$ its tangent bundle. Does anyone know how to identify $\bigwedge^2 TM$ with $\mathfrak{so}(n)$?
2026-05-15 06:12:47.1778825567
How to identify $\bigwedge^2 TM$ with $\mathfrak{so}(n)$?
131 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in LIE-GROUPS
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- homomorphism between unitary groups
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Is it true that if a Lie group act trivially on an open subset of a manifold the action of the group is trivial (on the whole manifold)?
- Find non-zero real numbers $a,b,c,d$ such that $a^2+c^2=b^2+d^2$ and $ab+cd=0$.
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
geometry
circles
algebraic-number-theory
functions
real-analysis
elementary-set-theory
proof-verification
proof-writing
number-theory
elementary-number-theory
puzzle
game-theory
calculus
multivariable-calculus
partial-derivative
complex-analysis
logic
set-theory
second-order-logic
homotopy-theory
winding-number
ordinary-differential-equations
numerical-methods
derivatives
integration
definite-integrals
probability
limits
sequences-and-series
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
First of all, I don't think you can identify $\bigwedge^2TM$ with $\mathfrak{so}(n)$, unless the tangent bundle is trivial.
Point-wise, however, $\bigwedge^2T_xM$ consists of skew-symmetric second-order "contravariant" tensors at $x\in M$. These can be "lowered" by the metric to create "anti-self-adjoint" operators. In index notation, $A=\sum_{i,j}A^{ij}\partial_i\otimes\partial_j$ is in $\bigwedge^2T_xM$, if $A^{ij}=-A^{ji}$.
Then, we can use the metric to do a partial "lowering" as $\flat A=\sum_{i,j}A^i_{\ j}\partial_i\otimes dx^j$, where $A^i_{\ j}=\sum_kA^{ik}g_{kj}$. This tensor $\flat A$ can be seen as a linear transformation on $T_xM$. For any $v\in T_xM$, $$ \flat A(v)=\sum_{i,j}A^i_{\ j}v^j\partial_i. $$
It can be checked that this operator obeys the anti-self-adjointness condition $$ g(u,\flat A(v))=-g(\flat A(u),v). $$ We prove this by calculating in coordinates: $$ g(u,\flat A(v))=\sum_{i,j,k}g_{ij}u^iA^j_{\ k}v^k=\sum_{i,j,k,l} g_{ij}u^iA^{jl}g_{lk}v^k=-\sum_{i,j,k,l}g_{ij}u^iA^{lj}g_{lk}v^k \\ =-\sum_{i,j,k,l}u^iA^{l}_{\ i}g_{lk}v^k=-g(\flat A(u),v).$$
But opeators that obey the anti-self-adjointness condition are precisely the operators that can be identified with $\mathfrak{so}(n)$, because an element of $O(n)$ is defined (on $T_xM$) as a linear transformation that satisfies $g(B(u),B(v))=g(u,v)$, so if $B(t)$ is a smooth family of such operators, and $B(0)=Id$, then $$ \frac{d}{dt}g(B(t)u,B(t)v)|_{t=0}=g(B'(0)u,v)+g(u,B'(0)v)=0, $$ so if $A=B'(0)$, then $$ g(Au,v)=-g(u,Av). $$
This is for a single tangent space.
For a relation on bundles, we can construct a vector bundle whose fibers are $\mathfrak{so}(n)$s. It's total space is clearly given by $$ \bigsqcup_{x\in M}\mathfrak{so}(T_xM), $$ but can also be constructed differently:
We let $O(M)$ be the orthonormal frame bundle, which is a principal fiber bundle with structure group $G=O(n)$. $O(n)$ has a representation on $\mathfrak{so}(n)$ given by the adjoint representation $\text{Ad}:O(n)\mapsto GL(\mathfrak{so}(n))$, so we can construct an associated vector bundle as follows - we consider the set $O(M)\times\mathfrak{so}(n)$, with the equivalence relation $(e,A)\sim(e\Lambda,\text{Ad}(\Lambda^{-1})A)$ ($e\in O(M)$ and $\Lambda\in O(n)$). We call the quotient $$ O(M)\times_{O(n)}\mathfrak{so}(n)=O(M)\times\mathfrak{so}(n)/\sim, $$ and can be naturally equipped with a vector bundle structure, whose model fiber is $\mathfrak{so}(n)$.
It is this vector bundle which is isomorphic with $\bigwedge^2TM$ via the fiberwise vector space isomorphism detailed in the beginning of this answer.