I have problems proving the following statement. Prove that two metrics$\quad d_1,d_2 $ are topologically equivalent if and only if $$\forall x\in E\quad \forall \epsilon>0 \quad\exists \delta>0:$$ $$\forall y\in E\quad d_1(x,y)<\delta \Rightarrow d_2(x,y)<\epsilon$$ $$\quad \quad \quad \quad d_2(x,y)<\delta \Rightarrow d_1(x,y)<\epsilon$$
2026-02-23 04:41:55.1771821715
How to prove criterion for topological equivalence of metrics?
163 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in EQUIVALENT-METRICS
- Show that the metrics $\rho(x,y) = \sqrt{d(x,y)}$ and $\tau(x,y) = \min\{d(x,y),1\}$ are equivalent to $d(x,y)$.
- Every two norms on a finite dimensional (real or complex) vector space $V$ are equivalent.
- Are d1 and lift metric equivalent distances?
- Show that $d$ is equivalent to the usual metric on $\mathbb{N}$ but that $(\mathbb{N},d)$ is not complete.
- Prove that two metrics generate the same topology.
- Equivalence of Euclidean metric and the metric $d(x,y) = min{1, |x-y|}$ on $\mathbb R^{2}$
- Topology induced by equivalent norms
- Show that, for every metric $d$, the metrics $d/(1+d)$ and $\min\{1,d\}$ are equivalent
- Existence of a metric on $\Bbb Q$ which is complete and equivalent to the usual metric.
- Determine if two norms are equivalent.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Two topologies say $\mathcal T_1, \mathcal T_2$ on a set $X$ are equivalent, if you have $$\forall x\in X, \forall \mathcal U_1 \in \mathcal T_1 \text{ with } x\in \mathcal U_1,~ \exists \mathcal U_2 \in \mathcal T_2 \text{ such that}\quad x\in \mathcal U_2\subset \mathcal U_1 $$ and $$\forall x\in X, \forall \mathcal U_2 \in \mathcal T_2 \text{ with } x\in \mathcal U_2,~ \exists \mathcal U_1 \in \mathcal T_1 \text{ such that}\quad x\in \mathcal U_1\subset \mathcal U_2. $$
Assume you have the hypothesis you gave above, let $x\in X$ and let $\mathcal U_1 \in \mathcal T_1$ such that $x\in \mathcal U_1$, there exists $r>0$ such that $B_{d_1}(x,r)\subset \mathcal U_1$, let such an $r>0$. By hypothese, there exists $\delta>0$ such that $$ \forall y\in X, d_2(x,y)\leq \delta \Rightarrow d_1(x,y)\leq r.$$ Let such a $\delta>0$, we have : $$ \mathcal U_2 := B_{d_2}(x,\delta)\subset B_{d_1}(x,r)\subset \mathcal U_1 \quad \text{ and } \quad x\in \mathcal U_2$$
You can proceed the same way to prove the other part of the statement.
Now, assume the two topologies are equivalent, Let $x\in X$ and let $\varepsilon>0$, the ball $B_{d_1}(x,\varepsilon) \in \mathcal T_1$ thus there exists a $\mathcal U_2 \in \mathcal T_2$ such that $\mathcal U_2 \subset B_{d_1}(x,\varepsilon)$ and $x\in \mathcal U_2$. Let such an $\mathcal U_2\in \mathcal T_2$. There exists $\delta>0$ such that $B_{d_2}(x,\delta)\subset \mathcal U_2$, let such a $\delta>0$. We have : $$ x\in B_{d_2}(x,\delta) \subset \mathcal U_2 \subset B_{d_1}(x,\varepsilon)$$ thus $$ \forall y\in B_{d_2}(x,\delta), y\in B_{d_1}(x,\varepsilon)$$ which can be stated also : $$ \forall y\in X, d_2(x,y)< \delta \Rightarrow d_1(x,y)\leq \varepsilon$$
The other statement can be proven the same way.