Show that : $$ p \times [(a \times q) \times (b \times r)] \\ + q \times [(a \times r) \times (b \times p)] \\ + r \times [(a \times p) \times (b \times q)] = 0 $$ where $\times$ is cross product and $a, b, p, q,$ and $r$ are vectors.
2026-03-26 16:56:48.1774544208
How to prove that a sum of quintuple cross products is equal to zero?
350 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in VECTORS
- Proof that $\left(\vec a \times \vec b \right) \times \vec a = 0$ using index notation.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Why is the derivative of a vector in polar form the cross product?
- Why does AB+BC=AC when adding vectors?
- Prove if the following vectors are orthonormal set
- Stokes theorem integral, normal vector confusion
- Finding a unit vector that gives the maximum directional derivative of a vector field
- Given two non-diagonal points of a square, find the other 2 in closed form
- $dr$ in polar co-ordinates
- How to find reflection of $(a,b)$ along $y=x, y = -x$
Related Questions in VECTOR-ANALYSIS
- Does curl vector influence the final destination of a particle?
- Gradient and Hessian of quadratic form
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Estimation of connected components
- Finding a unit vector that gives the maximum directional derivative of a vector field
- Gradient of transpose of a vector.
- Solve line integral
- Directional derivative: what is the relation between definition by limit and definition as dot product?
- Chain rule with intermediate vector function
- For which $g$ is $f(x)= g(||x||) \frac{x}{||x||}$ divergence free.
Related Questions in CROSS-PRODUCT
- Proof that $\left(\vec a \times \vec b \right) \times \vec a = 0$ using index notation.
- Why is the derivative of a vector in polar form the cross product?
- Calculus III Vector distance problem.
- linear algebra - Parallel vectors
- Geometry of the plane in 3D and cross product
- derivative of cross product of vectors with respect to vector
- Finding perpendicular and parallel vectors
- Why is the unit vector negative when solving $\sin(a-b) = \sin(a)\cos(b) - \cos(a)\sin(b)$?
- A question about cross product
- Linear Algebra: Cross Product w/ Matrices
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
We have to prove that :
$$\underbrace{\left(\begin{array}{r}P \times [(\color{red}{A} \times Q) \times (\color{red}{B} \times R)] \\ + \ Q \times [(\color{red}{A} \times R) \times (\color{red}{B} \times P)] \\ + \ R \times [(\color{red}{A} \times P) \times (\color{red}{B} \times Q)]\end{array}\right)}_{L}= 0\tag{1}$$
I will prove the result in the case where $P,Q,R$ are independent, i.e., constitute a basis of $\mathbb{R^3}$.
I will use the following notations : $|ABC|$ for the determinant with columns $A,B,C$ in that order and
$\cdot$ for the dot product,
'*' for multiplication of a vector by a number,
and the ordinary dot for multiplication of two numbers.
Let us recall the rather classical vector quadruple relationship :
$$(A \times B) \times (C \times D)=|ABD|*C - |ABC|*D\tag{2}$$
(that can be as well found on pages 76-77 of the very clear 1901 book by Gibbs/Wilson).
Let us use (2) three times so as to transform the LHS $L$ of (1) into :
$$L=\left(\begin{array}{r}P \times (|AQR|*B-|AQB|*R)\\+ \ Q \times (|ARP|*B-|ARB|*P)\\+ \ R \times (|APQ|*B-|APB|*Q)\end{array}\right)$$
We have to show that $L$ is zero.
With this purpose in mind, as we have assumed that $\{P,Q,R\}$ constitute a basis of $\mathbb{R^3}$, it suffices to show that the three dot products $L \cdot P, L \cdot Q, L \cdot R$ are $0$.
Let us show that $L \cdot P=0.$
We recall that $(U \times V) \cdot W=|UVW|$. We can write
$$L \cdot P=0 \ + \ |QBP|.|ARP| \ + \ 0 \ + \ |RBP|.|APQ| \ -\ |RQP|.|APB|$$
Why is this expression $0$ ? Because of Grassmann-Plücker relationships as given for example in Is Grassmann-Plucker relation implied by 3-term Grassmann-Plucker relation? with $r=3$ :
$$|x_1x_2x_3|.|y_1y_2x_3|-|x_1y_1x_3|.|x_2y_2x_3|+|x_1y_2x_3|.|y_1x_2x_3|=0$$
(take $y_1=A, y_2=B, x_3=P, x_2=R, x_1=Q$ and use properties of determinants).
I will prove neither $L.Q=0$, nor $L.R=0$ because the same technique is applicable.
Remarks :
1) Relationship (1) is identical to Tomihisa identity given in page 30 of this very nice article by S. Tabachnikov. I will try to establish the link with our problem.
2) Another mention of the Grassmann-Pluecker relationships can be found in the following text that I reproduce as an image (Muir, Theory of Determinants, Vol 5, p. 5) :