I need to prove that filed F is extension of K. I know that F is isomorphic with $K[x]/(m)$, K is also some field and polynomial $m \in K[x]$ which is irreducible over K. I think, if F and K is isomorphic they have to be same. So F could be a trivial extension field. Is it right? Any tips how to prove it?
2026-03-25 13:56:58.1774447018
How to prove that F is extension of K
35 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in EXTENSION-FIELD
- Field $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$ with $\alpha=\sqrt[3]7+2i$
- $\overline{A}\simeq\overline{k}^n $ implies $A\simeq K_1\times\cdots\times K_r$
- Extension of field, $\Bbb{R}(i \pi) = \Bbb{C} $
- A field extension of degree $\leq 2$
- Field not separable
- Intersections of two primitive field extensions of $\mathbb{Q}$
- Fields generated by elements
- Find the degree of splitting field of a separable polynomial over finite field
- Eigenvalues of an element in a field extension
- When a product of two primitive elements is also primitive?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Since $K\subseteq K[x]$ (actually an isomorphic copy), $K\subseteq K[x]/(m)$, for otherwise there are $a,b\in K$ with $a\neq b$ such that $a-b\in (m)$. But $a-b$ is a unit, so $a-b=0$. Since $K[x]/(m)\supseteq K$, and $K[x]\cong F$, it must be the case that $K\cong E$, where $E\subseteq F$. I don't think that it is required for $F\supseteq K$, just from naming of elements, but you could consider it an extension if you view isomorphic fields as the same.
If you are asking if $K[x]/(m)\cong K$, this is not true in general; consider $\mathbb{Z}_2/(x^2)\cong\mathbb{F}_4$.
Sorry if this didn't answer your question (I would have posted in comments if I had 50 reputation), I am kind of confused on why the fields $E,K$ must be equal instead of isomorphic... You could just rename "1,0" to get an isomorphic field which doesn't contain the "same" elements.