Consider commutative semigroup S and its Grothendieck completion group G(S).Suppose I insist on defining G(S) as free abelian group on basis $[a]$ (with $a\in S$) divided out by the relations $[a+b]-[a]-[b]$. How do I show with that definition that if the images of $a,b\in S$ become equal in G(S), then necessarily there existed $c\in S$ with a+c=b+c ? I know it true because I can prove it with other construction of grothendieck group, but I should like direct proof with above free abelian group construction.
2026-02-23 02:56:23.1771815383
How to show directly that two elements become equal in Grothendieck group?
546 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GROUP-THEORY
- What is the intersection of the vertices of a face of a simplicial complex?
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- How to construct a group whose "size" grows between polynomially and exponentially.
- Conjugacy class formula
- $G$ abelian when $Z(G)$ is a proper subset of $G$?
- A group of order 189 is not simple
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
- subgroups that contain a normal subgroup is also normal
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-K-THEORY
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Rational points on conics over fields of dimension 1
- An immediate result of fundamental theorem of algebraic $K$-theory.
- Algebraic $K_2$ as "universal receptacle"?
- trying to understand the connecting homomorphism between K theory groups
- Are these two definitions stably isomorphic modules / $K_0(A)$ equivalent?
- Motivation of $G_0$ group
- Degreewise cofibration in $S_nC$
- Definition of algebraic K-theory space
- Nerve of a simplicial category
Related Questions in GROTHENDIECK-CONSTRUCTION
- Minimal site that induces a stack from a psuedofunctor
- Grothendieck group of integer sets with Minkowski addition
- Grothendieck construction for functors to the category of relations
- Limits in a Grothendieck fibration
- Question about construction of The Grothendieck group.
- Is $\mathbf{Cat}/\mathcal{C}\simeq\mathbf{Cat}^{\mathcal C^\mathrm{op}}$ when $\mathcal C$ is a $1$-category?
- Proof check: Calculating the Grothendieck group of $k[x]$ where $k$ is a field
- Does this construction define a ring and if so what properties does it have?
- The Grothendieck group construction
- Constructing the real numbers from the nonnegative real numbers
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Well your notation is a little bit confusing. Since we are considering free abelian groups, we should avoid additive notations for the commutative semigroup S. Let's talk of $(S, \ast )$. If $F(S)$ is the free abelian group with basis $S$, we can assume $S \subseteq F(S)$. So the set of relations is $$R = \{ (a \ast b) -a - b : a,b \in S \}.$$ Then, the Grothendieck completion is the abelian group $$G(S) = F(S)/ \langle R \rangle.$$ If $a \in S$, I'll denote the coset $a + \langle R \rangle$ by $[a]$.
The proof isn't hard. You'll just need to remember that in free abelian groups the expression in terms of a basis is unique. You can find one proof, with an ugly notation, in Rotman's 'Advanced Modern Algebra'. I'll reproduce below the proof on Magum's book 'An Algebraic Introduction to K-theory'.
Suppose that $[a]=[b]$. Then, $a-b \in \langle R \rangle$. That is, $$a-b = \sum_{i=1}^n n_i((a_i \ast b_i) - a_i - b_i),$$ where $n_i = 1$ or $-1$ and $a_i, b_i \in S$. Bringing terms with negative coefficients to the other side, $$ a + \sum_{n_i = -1}(a_i \ast b_i) + \sum_{n_i = 1}(a_i + b_i) = b + \sum_{n_i = 1}(a_i \ast b_i) + \sum_{n_i = -1}(a_i + b_i).$$ Since $S$ is a basis of $F(S)$, the terms on one side of the equation are a permutation of those on the other side. Since $(S, \ast )$ is commutative, it follow that, in S, $$ a \ast \prod_{n_i = -1}(a_i \ast b_i) \ast \prod_{n_i = 1}(a_i \ast b_i) = b \ast \prod_{n_i = 1}(a_i \ast b_i) \ast \prod_{n_i = -1}(a_i \ast b_i). $$ So $a \ast c = b \ast c$, where $$ c = \prod_{i = 1}^n (a_i \ast b_i).$$