How to show the inequation by using Hessian comparison.

897 Views Asked by At

In the below picture ,how to show the inequation 1?

In fact,I'm not familiar with Hessian comparison.So, hope a detail answer , Thanks very much.

The below picture is form 194th page of here ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

enter image description here

enter image description here

2

There are 2 best solutions below

11
On BEST ANSWER

The Hessian comparison theorem is:

If the sectional curvatures of a manifold are bounded below by $M$, then the distance function $s(x) = d(p,x)$ satisfies $\nabla^2 s \le \nabla^2_M s_M$, where $s_M$ is the corresponding distance function on the space of constant curvature $M$.

[see e.g. ON THE DISTRIBUTIONAL HESSIAN OF THE DISTANCE FUNCTION by Mantegazza, Mascellani & Uraltsev.]

We know $|R_{ijkl}|<M$ and thus our sectional curvatures $K(e_i,e_j) = R_{ijij}$ satisfy $K > -M$; so we can compare to the hyperbolic space with curvature $-M$. In polar coordinates this space has metric $$g_M = ds^2 + \frac1M \sinh^2(\sqrt M s) d\Omega^2$$ where $d \Omega^2$ is the round metric on the unit $(n-1)$-sphere. The Hessian of the distance function is (see e.g. Petersen Chapter 2.3) $$\nabla^2s_M = \frac1{\sqrt M} \sinh(\sqrt M s) \cosh(\sqrt M s) d\Omega^2 = \sqrt M \coth(\sqrt M s) (g_M - ds^2).$$

If we throw away the $-ds^2$ we get the estimate $$|\nabla^2 s_M| \le \sqrt M \coth(\sqrt M s)|g_M|.$$

Since $|g_M| = \sqrt{g^{ij}g_{ij}} = \sqrt n$ depends only on the dimension $n$, the theorem (along with an upper bound for $\coth$ you can try proving) gives us the estimate $$|\nabla^2 s| \le |\nabla^2 s_M| \le \sqrt {nM} \coth \sqrt M s \le \sqrt n \left(\sqrt M + \frac1s\right).$$

It looks like the authors have a slightly better estimate here with $\sqrt M$ instead of $\sqrt {nM}$ - I'm not sure whether the mistake is mine or theirs. (Taking the $-ds^2$ in to account only improves the $\sqrt n$ to $\sqrt{n-1}$.) It doesn't matter anyway, since we can still choose a constant $C_3$ dependent only on dimension that makes it work.

1
On

I just using this Hessian comparison,which I am familiar with.

enter image description here

enter image description here