When we use Riemann Sums to evaluate definite integrals, and tend the limit of width of the rectangle to zero, then the area become zero.
If I use similar logic to evaluate arc length (not the traditional formula), by-
$l^2=h^2+(f(x+h)-f(x))^2$, where $l$ is arc length, and do $$\lim\limits_{h\to0} \sqrt{h^2+(f(x+h)-f(x))^2}+\cdots+\sqrt{h^2+(f(x+nh)-f(x+(n-1)h))^2}$$ What will it be?
2026-03-29 21:34:08.1774820048
How to simplify my arc length formula.
77 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LIMITS
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- limit points at infinity
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Maximal interval of existence of the IVP
- Divergence of power series at the edge
- Compute $\lim_{x\to 1^+} \lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\ln(n!)}{n^x} $
- why can we expand an expandable function for infinite?
- Infinite surds on a number
- Show that f(x) = 2a + 3b is continuous where a and b are constants
- If $a_{1}>2$and $a_{n+1}=a_{n}^{2}-2$ then Find $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}$ $\frac{1}{a_{1}a_{2}......a_{n}}$
Related Questions in SOFT-QUESTION
- Reciprocal-totient function, in term of the totient function?
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Does approximation usually exclude equality?
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Online resources for networking and creating new mathematical collaborations
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
- How do you prevent being lead astray when you're working on a problem that takes months/years?
- Is it impossible to grasp Multivariable Calculus with poor prerequisite from Single variable calculus?
- A definite integral of a rational function: How can this be transformed from trivial to obvious by a change in viewpoint?
Related Questions in RIEMANN-SUM
- Which type of Riemann Sum is the most accurate?
- How to evaluate a Riemann (Darboux?) integral?
- Hint required : Why is the integral $\int_0^x \frac{\sin(t)}{1+t}\mathrm{d}t$ positive?
- Method for evaluating Darboux integrals by a sequence of partitions?
- How to tell whether a left and right riemann sum are overestiamtes and underestimates?
- Calculating an integral using the limit definition
- How to express a Riemann sum as a definite integral
- Proof of $\int_{a}^{a} f(x)dx = 0$
- A confusion about the proof of Darboux Criterion
- $\int _0^ax\left(1-\frac{x}{a}\right)dx\:$ using Riemann Sums
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
We need to get our head around the fact that the number of summands is becoming arbitrarily large, even as individual summands are approaching zero. To put it in stark terms, consider the limit
$$\lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{j=1}^n \frac 1n$$
By the 'naive' argument, "Look, each term $\frac 1n$ becomes zero in some sense, so isn't the limit of the sum zero?".
No. Because the number of summands offsets the smallness of the individual summands. And in this case, that sum is equal to one for all $n \geq 1$ and hence so is the limit.
By the way, the sum above is one Riemann sum expression for the integral
$$\int_0^1 1 \ dx$$ which of course is equal to one.
Added:
Rewriting your formula, the arc length of a smooth function $f$ over an interval $[a,b]$, with a step size $h = \frac{b-a}{n}$ is the limit
$$\lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{j=1}^n \sqrt{h^2 + \left(f(a + jh) - f(a + (j-1)h) \right)^2}$$
This is equal to
$$\lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{j=1}^n \sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{f(a + jh) - f(a + (j-1)h)}{h}\right)^2} \cdot h $$
In the limit as $n\to\infty$ or $h\to 0$, the inner quotient is the derivative and we recover the traditional formula.