If this is not sufficient precision, you may find $x_2$.
[$x_2\approx1.000198085$]
Here is a desmos graph of where the function crosses the $x$-axis:
Now let us look again at equation $(2)$ for $f^\prime(x)$. We see that $f$ will have slope $0$ when $x=\dfrac{100}{\ln(1.02)}\approx5050$. So for $x>5050$ the graph of $y=f(x)$ is decreasing indicating the possibility of another solution greater than $5050$. In fact the second derivative
$$ f^{\prime\prime}(x)=-\frac{100}{x^2} $$
tells is the graph is concave down guaranteeing that there is another solution larger than $5050$.
Equation $(2)$ tells us that the graph is very steep at $x\approx1$ but very flat (horizontal) at $x\approx5050$ so Newton's method converged very fast at $x_0=1$ but will converge much slower if we pick $x_0=5050$.
For this I resorted to a graphing tool, desmos.com and set a wide range for the $x$-axis: the interval $[5000,100000]$.
This tells us that $x_0=55000$ is a much better first guess than $5050$.
Substituting into equation $(1)$ gives
$$ x_1=55131.5$$
Finally, by taking natural logarithm of both sides of the original equation
$$ (1.02)^x=x^{100} $$
I automatically excluded any negative solutions. To include those let
First, this equation does not involve polynomials, since $n$ certainly will not be a positive integer. Accordingly, I will use $x$ in place of $n$.
First, one should take the logarithm of both sides:
$$x\ln(1.02)=100\ln(x)$$
Next define a function
$$ f(x)=100\ln(x)-x\ln(1.02) $$
Then we need to find the value of $x$ satisfying the equation
$$ f(x)=100\ln(x)-x\ln(1.02)=0$$
We can guess that the value of $x$ will be close to $1$ so we use Newton's method with an initial guess $x_0=1$.
In Newton's method one makes an initial guess for the value of $x$ and uses that guess to produce a better guess according to the formula
$$ x_{k+1}= x_k-\frac{f(x_k)}{f^\prime(x_k)}\tag{1}$$
With a first guess of $x_0=1$ we find that $f(1)=-\ln(1.02)$, and since
$$f^\prime(x)=\frac{100}{x}-\ln(1.02)\tag{2} $$
we find that
$$f^\prime(1)=100-\ln(1.02)$$
Substituting these values into equation $(1)$ above give a second guess of
$$ x_1=1-\frac{-\ln(1.02)}{100-\ln(1.02)}\approx1.00198 $$
If this is not sufficient precision, you may find $x_2$.
[$x_2\approx1.000198085$]
Here is a desmos graph of where the function crosses the $x$-axis:
Now let us look again at equation $(2)$ for $f^\prime(x)$. We see that $f$ will have slope $0$ when $x=\dfrac{100}{\ln(1.02)}\approx5050$. So for $x>5050$ the graph of $y=f(x)$ is decreasing indicating the possibility of another solution greater than $5050$. In fact the second derivative
$$ f^{\prime\prime}(x)=-\frac{100}{x^2} $$
tells is the graph is concave down guaranteeing that there is another solution larger than $5050$.
Equation $(2)$ tells us that the graph is very steep at $x\approx1$ but very flat (horizontal) at $x\approx5050$ so Newton's method converged very fast at $x_0=1$ but will converge much slower if we pick $x_0=5050$.
For this I resorted to a graphing tool, desmos.com and set a wide range for the $x$-axis: the interval $[5000,100000]$.
This tells us that $x_0=55000$ is a much better first guess than $5050$.
Substituting into equation $(1)$ gives
$$ x_1=55131.5$$
Finally, by taking natural logarithm of both sides of the original equation
$$ (1.02)^x=x^{100} $$
I automatically excluded any negative solutions. To include those let
$$ g(x)=x^{100}-1.02^x \tag{3}$$
$$ g^\prime(x)=100x^{99}-\ln(1.02)1.02^x \tag{4}$$
A desmos.com graph of $g$ looks like this:
indicating we should look for a solution to equation $(3)$ beginning with $x_0=-1$. This will lead to the negative solution $−0.999802$.