Assume that $$ \begin{pmatrix} x' \\ y' \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} u & Dv \\ v & -u \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \end{pmatrix} $$ with $D>0$, then we have $$ x'^2+Dy'^2 = (ux+Dvy)^2 + D(vx-uy)^2= (u^2+Dv^2)(x^2+Dy^2) $$ But I don't know how to understand this equation from the point of view of linear algebra. I try to define an inner product $\langle(a,b),(c,d)\rangle= ac+Dbd$, then $x^2+Dy^2=\langle(x,y), (x,y)\rangle$. Let $$ A = \begin{pmatrix} u & Dv \\ v & -u \end{pmatrix}, b' = \begin{pmatrix} x' \\ y' \end{pmatrix},b = \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \end{pmatrix} $$ We have $b'= Ab$, $\langle b',b'\rangle=-|A|\langle b,b\rangle$. How this happen? I am stuck.
2026-04-12 11:34:34.1775993674
How to understand this equation by linear algebra?
94 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in INNER-PRODUCTS
- Inner Product Same for all Inputs
- How does one define an inner product on the space $V=\mathbb{Q}_p^n$?
- Inner Product Uniqueness
- Is the natural norm on the exterior algebra submultiplicative?
- Norm_1 and dot product
- Is Hilbert space a Normed Space or a Inner Product Space? Or it have to be both at the same time?
- Orthonormal set and linear independence
- Inner product space and orthogonal complement
- Which Matrix is an Inner Product
- Proof Verification: $\left\|v-\frac{v}{\|v\|}\right\|= \min\{\|v-u\|:u\in S\}$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Inner products are not the way to go. The identity you're trying to understand is called Brahmagupta's identity, and note that in that identity $(u, v)$ and $(x, y)$ have symmetric roles but you've given them asymmetric roles in your matrix equation, with one being a matrix and one being a vector.
Instead the way to proceed is to promote everything to a matrix, as follows. Consider the matrix $X = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} 0 & -d \\ 1 & 0 \end{array} \right]$. We have $X^2 = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} -d & 0 \\ 0 & -d \end{array} \right]$ (so $X$ satisfies $X^2 + d = 0$), which is a multiple of the identity, so it follows that $X$ generates a subalgebra of matrices of the form
$$a + bX = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} a & -db \\ b & a \end{array} \right]$$
(here when I write $a$ I mean $aI$ but I don't like including the $I$'s explicitly) and in particular that this subalgebra of matrices is closed under multiplication. Note that this matrix has determinant $a^2 + db^2$ and that the signs are different from the ones you chose. Now closure under multiplication explicitly looks like
$$(a + bX)(p + qX) = (ap - dbq) + (aq + bp) X$$
or, in matrix form,
$$\left[ \begin{array}{cc} a & -db \\ b & a \end{array} \right] \left[ \begin{array}{cc} p & -dq \\ q & p \end{array} \right] = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} ap-dbq & -d(aq+bp) \\ aq+bp & ap-dbq \end{array} \right]$$
and taking determinants of both sides gives Brahmpagupta's identity
$$\boxed{ (a^2 + db^2)(p^2 + dq^2) = (ap - dbq)^2 + d(aq + bp)^2 }$$
as desired. Abstractly this matrix $X$ comes from considering the action of left multiplication by $\sqrt{-d}$ on the basis $\{ 1, \sqrt{-d} \}$ of the quadratic field $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-d})$. Left multiplication embeds $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-d})$ into $M_2(\mathbb{Q})$ and taking the determinant produces what is called the norm $N(a + b \sqrt{-d}) = a^2 + db^2$. The multiplicativity of the determinant then translates into the multiplicativity of the norm.